© 2001 www.mosque.com
The Mosque of the Internet
Grand Shaykh, Professor Hasan Qaribullah Dean of Umm Durman Islamic University
Shaykh, Ahmad Darwish
Hon. Jabir Herbert Muhammad
former manager of Muhammad Ali
Foreword by Professor Hasan El Fatih
Dean of Umm Durman Islamic University
This book was written in Arabic
by Imam Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, or Algazel as he was known to medieval Europe (died 505/1111).
His numerous works are well known, respected and quoted not only the middle east
but in the higher universities of west. His contribution to theology and
philosophy have proved to be major cornerstones of resource throughout the
During the revival of Greek philosophy in the middle ages, many Christians were attracted and swayed by the persuasion of Greek logic. In an effort to protect Christianity, Christian theologians relied upon the profound arguments of Al Ghazali to defeat the adherents of Greek philosophy and thereby protected their religion.
Al Ghazali's works have been translated and printed in many languages. Comparative studies have shown that Jean Jacques Rousseau, known in the west as the pioneer of children's education, based his ideas and methods upon the work of Al Ghazali.
The Shorter Encyclopedia of Islam says of Al Ghazali: "He was the most original
thinker that Islam produced and its greatest theologian." A.J. Arberry,
professor and director of the Middle East Centre at the University of Cambridge,
England referred to him as being: "He was one of the greatest mystical
theologians of Islam and indeed of all mankind." I pray that the readers will
benefit from the sound reasoning which they are about to embark upon and that it
will open guiding channels of thought that will give pleasure in this life and
in the Hereafter. Hasan El Fatih
Umm Durman Sudan 1992
The first translation into English was by the late Professor Nabih Amin Al Faris, American University, Beirut, October 31, 1962 with the examination of Dr. John H. Patton, Professor of Religion Park College, Parksville, MO. USA. The reason for this work being undertaken yet again is due to the need for updating this work and also to rectify English linguistic usages and to adapt it for the computer with the addition of an index.
If the reader encounters difficulty in understanding some parts of this book, we would advise a visit to the grand philosopher and Sufi of Islam, Professor Hasan El Fatih, at the Mosque of Sheikh Muhammad El Fatih, Umm Durman, Sudan. It is interesting to note that in the English versions of the Bible we found that the proper noun of the Creator referred to as God whereas we found in the Arabic edition of the Bible the proper noun changes to be Allah which is the same proper noun mentioned in the Arabic Koran. In the Name of the Compassionate, the Merciful Allah, This is the Book of the Foundations of Islamic Belief.
Rather, He resembles no existent and no existent resembles Him. Nothing is like
Him and He is not like anything. Measure does not bind Him and boundaries do not
contain Him. Directions do not surround Him and neither the earth nor the
Heavens are on different sides of Him.
Truly, He is controlling the Throne in the manner in which He said and in the sense in which He willed - in a state of transcendence that is removed from parallel and touch, residence, fixity of location, stability, envelopment, and movement.
The Throne does not support Him, but the Throne and those who carry it are supported by the Subtleness of His Power and are constrained by His Firmness. He is above the Throne and Heavens and above everything to the limits of the earth with an aboveness which does not bring Him nearer to the Throne and the Heavens, just as it does not make Him further from the earth. Rather, He is Highly Exalted above the Throne and the Heavens, just as He is Highly Exalted above the earth. Nevertheless, He is near to every entity and is "nearer to the worshiper than his juggler vein" and He witnesses everything since His nearness does not resemble the nearness of bodies, just as His Essence does not resemble the essence of bodies. He does not exist in anything, just as nothing exists in Him: Exalted is He that a place could contain Him, just as sanctified is He that no time could limit Him.
For, He was as before He had created time and place, and just as He was, He is now. He is distinct from His creatures through His attributes. There is not in His Essence any other than Him, nor does His Essence exist in any other than Him.
He is Exalted from change and movement. Substance does not reside in Him and the quality of substance do not befall Him. Rather, He is in the attributes of His Majesty beyond cessation. And He is in the attributes of His Perfection. He is not in need of an increase in perfection. In His Essence, His Existence is known by reason (in this life).
In the Everlasting Life, His Essence is seen by the eyes of the righteous as a favor from Him, and a subtlety as a completion of favors from Him through their beholding His Gracious Face.
Whatever He decrees cannot be numbered neither does His Knowledge end.
He is Knowledgeable of all the known, encompassing all that happens in the
depths of earth to the highest heavens. He is Knowledgeable in which there is
not an atom that escapes His Knowledge in heaven and earth.
Rather, He knows the stamping of the black ant upon the solid rock in the
darkest night. He perceives the movement of a particle of dust in mid-air.
He knows the secrets and that which is more hidden.
He is the Overseer of the whispering of the self and the flow of thoughts, and
the most deepest concealment of the selves.
With a knowledge which is ancient from eternity and by which He has not ceased
to be described through the ages.
Not by a knowledge which is subject to updating by occurring and circulating in His Essence.
He is the Willer of all existence and the Planner of all contingent things.
There is nothing that occurs in His visible or invisible world except by His
prior planning and His execution whether it is little or plenteous, small or
large, good or evil, benefit or harm, belief or unbelief, gratitude or
ingratitude, prosperity or loss, increase or decrease, obedience or disobedience
all is according to His Wisdom and Will, what He wills occurs and what He does
not will does not occur. There is not a glance of the onlooker nor a stray
thought that is not subject to His Will.
He is the Creator at first, the Restorer, the Doer of whatsoever He wills. There
is none that rescinds His command, and none that supplements His decrees, and
there is no escape for a worshiper from disobeying Him, except by His Help and
Mercy, and none has power to obey Him except by His Will. Even if mankind, jinn,
angels, and devils were to unite to try to move the weight of an atom in the
world or to render it still, without His Will they would fail.
His Will subsists in His Essence amongst His Attributes. He has not ceased to be
described by it from eternity, willing, - in His Infinity - the existence of the
things at their appointed time which He has decreed. So they come into existence
at their appointed times as He has willed in His Infinity without precedence or
delay. They come to pass in accordance with His Knowledge and His Will without
variation or change.
He directs matters not through arrangement of thought and awaiting the passage of time, and so no affair occupies Him from another affair.
The Koran is read by tongues, written in books, and remembered in the heart, yet it is, nevertheless ancient, subsisting in the Essence of Allah, not subject to division and or separation through its transmission to the heart and paper (by this he meant that the movement of the reciter's tongue and his management of the flow of air in his mouth and ear etc., or the writer's inscription upon paper, all of which are created. Whereas the logic of Ghazali addresses what is beyond this human quality and dimension of time and physic. Thereby he refers to the Koran before one's movement of the tongue or transcription onto paper. Most errors have come from our human dimensions, and that we try to describe Divine attributes through our own limited human attributes - Darwish.) Moses - Allah praised him and gave him peace - heard the Speech of Allah without sound and without letter, just as the righteous see the Essence of Allah - the High - in the Hereafter, without substance or its quality. And since He has these qualities, He is Living, Knowing, Willing, Hearing, Seeing and Speaking with life, power, knowledge, will, hearing, sight, and speech, not solely through His Essence.
He, the Exalted, the High, there is no existence except Him, unless it occurs by
His action and proceeds from His Justice, in the best, perfect, complete and
He is Wise in His verdicts. His justice is not to be compared with that of worshipers, because it is conceivable that the worshiper is unjust when he deals with properties of other than his own. But, harm is not conceivable from Allah - the High - because He does not encounter any ownership of other than Himself, in which His dealing could be described to be harmful. Everything besides Him, children of Adam and jinn, angels and devils, heaven and earth, animals, plants, and inanimates, substance and its quality, as well as things perceived and things felt, are all originated things which He created by His Power and before they were nothing, since He existed in Eternity alone and there was nothing whatsoever with Him.
So He originated creation thereafter as a manifestation of His Power and a realization of that which had preceded of His Will and the realization of His Word in eternity, not because He had any need or necessity for it.
He is magnanimous in creating and inventing and in imposing obligations, not
doing it through necessity.
He is Gracious in beneficence and reform, though not through any need. Munificence and Kindness, Beneficence and Grace are His, since He is able to bring upon His creatures all manner of torture and to try them with all kinds of pain and affliction. Even if He should do this, it would be justice from Him, it would not be vile, it would not be tyrannous. He - the Mighty, the Glorified - rewards His believing worshipers for their acts of obedience according to generosity and encouragement rather than according to their merit and obligation. For there is no obligation upon Him in any deed towards anyone and tyranny is inconceivable in Him. For there is no right upon Him towards anyone.
As for His right to be obeyed it is obligatory and binding upon all creatures because He made it obligatory upon them through the tongues of His prophets and not by reason. But He sent His prophets and showed their truthfulness through explicit miracles, and they conveyed His commands and prohibitions as well as His promises and threats. So it became obligatory upon all creatures to believe them and what they brought.
Again, one should believe in the punishment of the grave, and that it is real
and that His Ruling is just over both the body and soul in accordance with His
And one should believe in the Scale with the two pans with its indicator - the magnitude of which is like the stages of the Heavens and the earth - in it, the deeds are weighed by the Power of Allah, and its weights or measures are the mustard seed and the atom, in order to establish exact justice. The records of good deeds will be placed in a fine image in the scale of light, and then the balance will be heavy according to its rank with Allah, by His Virtue.
The records of the evil deeds will be cast in an evil image in the scale of darkness, and they will be light in the balance through the Justice of Allah.
One should believe also that the Bridge is real; it is a Bridge stretched over
Hell, sharper than the edge of the sword and finer than a hair. The feet of the
unbelievers slip on it, according to the decree of Allah - the Exalted - and
they will fall into the Fire; but the feet of the believers stand firm upon it,
by the Grace of Allah, and so they are driven into the Everlasting residence.
And one should believe in the frequented pool, the Pool of Prophet Muhammad -
Allah has praised and given him peace -. From which the believers will drink
before entering Paradise and after crossing over the Bridge. Whoever drinks a
single mouthful from it will never thirst again. Its width is the distance of
one month's journey; its waters are whiter than milk and sweeter than honey.
Around it are ewers in number like the stars of the sky, and into it flow two
springs from al-Kawthar.
And one should believe in the Judgement and the distinctions between those in it, that some will be closely questioned, that some will be treated with forgiveness and that others will enter Paradise without questioning - these are the nearest.
Allah will ask whomsoever He will of the prophets concerning the deliverance of the Message, and whosoever of the unbelievers concerning their rejection of the Messengers; and He will ask the innovators concerning the way of the Prophet (sunnah) and the Muslims concerning their deeds. One should believe that the believer in the Oneness of Allah (if he enters Hell on account of his sins) will be released from Hell fire after he has been punished, so that there will not remain in Hell one single believer.
One should believe in the intercession of the prophets, of the learned, and of
the martyrs, then the rest of the believers - each according to his influence
and rank before Allah.
Whosoever remains of the believers and has no intercessor will be released through the Grace of Allah, the Mighty, the Glorified. Therefore not one single believer will abide in Hell forever; whosoever has in his heart the weight of an atom of belief will be brought out from there. One should believe the virtues of the Companions - may Allah be pleased with them - and their different ranks, and that the most excellent of mankind, after the Prophet - Allah praised and gave him peace - is Abu-Bakr, and then 'Umar, and then 'Uthman, and then 'Ali - may Allah be pleased with them - and one should think well of all the Companions and praise them, just as Allah - the Mighty, the Glorified - and His Prophet praised them all - Allah has praised the Prophet and given him peace -. All these were reported in the news and witnessed traditions (of the Prophet). Therefore whosoever believes in all this and believes in it without doubting will be among the people of truth and the congregation of the Way of the Prophet (sunnah), and indeed has separated themself from the followers of error and party of innovation.
So we ask Allah to perfect our faith and make us steadfast in the Religion for us and for all Muslims through His Mercy. Truly He is the Most Merciful. And may the praise of Allah be upon our Master Muhammad and upon every chosen worshiper.
You should know that what we have already mentioned under the Exposition of the Creed should be presented to children in their early years in order that they may commit it to memory. Its meaning will continue to be unfolded before them little by little as they grow older.
The first step is to commit it to memory, after which comes understanding, then
belief, then certainty and realization, all of which are ingrained in the child
Allah - the Exalted - from His Virtue over the heart of the human being has widened it by preparing the heart from the beginning for belief without the need for any argument or proof.
How can this be denied when all the articles of faith of the people are based upon pure repetition and imitation.
Yes, a belief which results from pure imitation may not be free of some weakness at the beginning, in that it can be shaken and impaired by its opposite whenever it is presented.
It should, therefore, be strengthened and confirmed in the heart of the child and the layman until it becomes well established and unshakable.
The way to strengthen and confirm it does not lie in learning the art of debate and dogmatic theology. Rather, to be busy with the recitation of the Koran and its explanation, and reading the Prophetic quotations and their meanings. Also, being busy in the performance of religious duties and acts of worship. It is in this way that one's belief continues to increase and become well established through the proofs and arguments heard from the Koran.
It is also increased through the explanation of the prophetic quotations with
their merits. As well as it is increased by the light of worshiping, the
fulfillment of obligatory duties and through observing the pious, by keeping
company with them, listening to them, observing their stages and manners in
obedience to Allah - the Mighty, the Glorified - the way in which they fear Him,
and humble themselves before Him.
So the first repetition was like the sowing of seeds in the heart and what followed is like its watering and nursing until it grew and was raised as a good tree having well established roots with branches reaching up into the air. The senses of the child should also be guarded with utmost care against argumentation and dogmatic theology, because what argumentation impairs is greater than what it repairs. What it corrupts is greater than what it reforms. In fact, strengthening the child through argumentation is like striking a tree with an iron ax in the hope that it will strengthen it. In such a way limbs are broken off that can lead to either its destruction, or, most probably impair its growth.
Seeing should, in this case, suffice as a reason.
Compare then the faith of the good, the righteous and the common person to that
of those of dogmatic theology and debators. You will find that the belief of the
ordinary person is as firm as a high mountain which is moved neither by storm
nor lightning. On the other hand, the belief of those of dogmatic theology and
he who guards his belief with the classified debate is like a thread hanging in
the air, blown to and fro by the wind.
This is true of all except those who have heard the proof of faith and have accepted it through fellowship, just as they have taken hold of belief itself and accepted it through fellowship, since there is no difference in fellowship between learning the proof or the proved.
Learning the proof is one thing; arriving at it through independent thinking is
another which is far from it.
If the child were to be brought up on this firm belief then occupy himself with gaining his livelihood, he might not be more enlightened. But according to the belief of the people of the truth he will be saved.
This is because the Religion did not obligate the uncivilized Arabs more than
believing and certifying in the apparent articles of belief.
They were never obligated to research, inquire, nor to be burdened with the
classification of arguments.
However, if one wishes to be among the travelers along the path of the Hereafter in order to be fortunate, one would be able to continue to act in accordance with one's knowledge by holding fast to piety, restraining one's soul from lust, practicing self-discipline and self-mortification. Then avenues of guidance would be opened which would reveal the realities of this belief through the Divine Light cast into one's heart through self-mortification in fulfillment of the promise of Allah who said: "Those who struggle in Our Cause, We will surely guide them to Our ways; and Allah is with those who do good." (Ch.29:69). This is, in truth, the precious pearl which is the ultimate goal of the belief of the sincere and those close to Allah.
It is the precious secret which rested in the heart of Abu Bakr al Siddiq - may Allah be pleased with him - and by which he excelled all others.
The revelation of this secret, rather, these secrets, have different stages,
that depend upon the degree of self-mortification and upon the degree in which
the inner self is clean and free of things other than Allah - the High - as well
as upon obtaining guidance by means of the light of faith.
This is just like the differences which exist among mankind in the comprehension
of the mysteries of medicine, jurisprudence and the other sciences because their
differences vary with their diligence and with their natural brilliance and
prudence. Just as the former variations are not limited, so are the latter not
For example, if you ask whether the study of argumentation and scholastic theology is blameworthy, like astrology, or that it is permissible or commendable, then, you should know that in this particular respect men go to excess and exaggeration on both sides. Some say that it is an innovation and unlawful and that, excluding the sin of polytheism, it is better for the worshiper to face the Creator guilty of every offense except that of Greek based logic of theology. Others say that it is an obligation and an ordinance either an Islamic public mandate or individual mandate. Therefore it is the best form of deed and the highest kind of obligation, and that it is the verification of the science of Oneness and the safeguard of the Religion of Allah - the High -. Among the famous jurisprudists who hold it unlawful are al Shafi, Malik, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Sufyan and all the scholars of the Prophetic quotations. Ibn Abd al A'la - may Allah be pleased with him - said, "On the day Al Shafi' - may Allah be pleased with him - debated with Hafs Al Fard, a Mu'tazilite theologian, Al Shafi' said: 'Excluding the sin of polytheism it is better for the worshiper to face his Creator guilty of every offense than to stand before Him with a little scholastic theology (the science of Divinity). I have also heard Hafs say things which I cannot repeat." He added, "I have discovered among the scholastic theologians things which I never expected to find. Excepting the sin of polytheism, if the worshiper is tried with all the prohibitions it is better for him than looking into scholastic theology."
Al Karabisi related that al Shafi' - may Allah be pleased with him - was once
asked about some of the scholastic theology and became infuriated and said, "Ask
Hafs al Fard and his cohorts about this - may Allah dishonor them -." When al
Shafi' - may Allah be pleased with him - was taken ill, Hafs came to him and
asked: "Who am I?" He replied, "You are Hafs al-Fard - may Allah neither protect
you nor take you under His auspices until you repent of your sins." He added:
"If people only but knew what predilections lurk in scholastic theology they
would run away from it as they would run away from a lion." And added, "Whenever
I hear a man say that the "name" is "the named" or different from "the named" I
bear witness that he is one of the people of scholastic theology and that he has
Al Za'farani related that al Shafi' once said, "My judgment concerning the scholastic theologians is that they should be beaten with palm branches and carried in that condition among the tribes and clans. While pronouncing "this is the penalty of those who desert the Koran and the prophetic sayings and take themselves to scholastic theology."
Ahmad ibn-Hanbal, said, "A scholastic theologian never succeeds. You cannot find anyone who, having dabbled in scholastic theology, without unsoundness in his heart." He was so strong in its condemnation that he ostracized al Harith al Muhasibi, in spite of the latter's asceticism and piety, because he wrote a work on the refutation of heresy, in which he told him, "Woe unto you. Do you not first state their heretical beliefs and then answer them, thereby compelling men to study these heresies and to ponder over these dubiosities, all of which will draw them into self opinionation and research."
Ahmad - may Allah have mercy on him - also said, "The scholastic theologians are heretics." Malik - may Allah have mercy on him - said "Have you seen how, when one of stronger argument confronts him he will discard his religion for a new one every day?" In other words, the position of the debators is changing. Malik - may Allah have mercy on him - also said, "The testimony of the people of innovation and heretics is not permissible." In interpreting this, some of his companions said that he meant by heretics the scholastic theologians, no matter whichever doctrine they might belong.
Abu-Yusuf said, "He who seeks knowledge through dogmatic theology will become a
heretic. Al-Hasan said, "Neither argue with heretics, associate with them nor
listen to them." Upon this the scholar of the prophetic quotations in the first
era have been unanimous. The narrations which came down to us from them are
innumerable. They have said that the companions refrained from it although they
are more knowledgeable of the realities and more capable of mastering the
wording than others because they knew what evil would come out of it.
For this reason the Prophet - praise and peace be upon him - said, "Destroyed
are those who split hairs! Destroyed are those who split hairs! Destroyed are
those who split hairs! And these are those who are extravagant in investigation
Also they proved by saying that if this subject were an integral part of Religion the Messenger of Allah - praise and peace be upon him - would have considered it to be the most important thing to command his Companions to address themselves with, and would have taught them its ways. He would have also praised it and commended its founders.
One must bear in mind that he even taught how one should clean oneself after relieving oneself and urged them to study the law of inheritance and commended them on it. He forbade them from speaking on destiny. And he said: "Refrain concerning destiny." And accordingly the Companions did so - may Allah be pleased with them -.
Needless to say, to add to what the teacher set forth is harm and error; the Companions are our teachers and our example, and we are their followers and students.
The other group proved that the forbidden in the scholastic theology are such terms as substance and substance's quality and the other strange terms with which the Companions - may Allah be pleased with them - were not familiar. But the matter is not difficult to explain, because there is not a single branch of knowledge in which new terms have not been introduced for the sake of conveying meanings.
For example, the Science of Prophetic Quotations, the Science of interpretation, and the Science of Jurisprudence. Had the recipients encountered terms such as refutation, invalidation, composition, deduction, and false collocation, as well as the other questions which are brought as evidence by analogy, they would not comprehend them.
Therefore the introduction of new terms to signify a definite meaning is just as
legitimate as inventing vessels with a new shape and form for use in permissible
If it is the meaning of these terms which is forbidden, we do not mean to attain through them anything except the knowledge of the proofs for the creation of the universe, the Oneness of the Creator, and His Attributes as they are mentioned in the Religion.
Since when, is it unlawful to know Allah - the High - with the proof? But if it is sectarianism, fanaticism, enmity, hatred, and all that dogmatic theologies and controversy breed which are meant and intended, then these are unlawful and should be guarded against and avoided, just as pride, conceit, hypocrisy, and the desire for power which the sciences of the Prophetic Quotations, Koran interpretation, and jurisprudence breed are unlawful and should be guarded against and avoided.
Nevertheless, some of the knowledge should not be prohibited because of the methods. How then is mentioning the proof or requesting it or searching for it prohibited, when Allah said, "Say: Bring your proof" And He - the Mighty, the Glorified - said "that he who would perish might perish by clear proof, and he who would live might live by clear proof." And He - the High - said: "Have you any authority for this?" In other words a proof. And He - the High - said: "Say: 'For Allah is the overwhelming proof.'" And He - the High - said: "Have you not seen him who disputed with Abraham about his Lord" up to "He who disbelieved became pale" When He - the Exalted - mentioned how Abraham presented the proof in debating and gained the upper hand over his opponent in a matter that praises Abraham.
And He - the Mighty, the Glorified - said: "This is Our proof, We give it to
Abraham over his nation." And He - the High - said: "They said: 'O Noah, you
have debated us a lot." And He - the High - said in Pharoah's story "And who is
the Lord of the World" up to "even if I bring to you something clear" Briefly,
the Koran, from its beginning to its end, is an argument with the unbelievers.
The greatest proof of theologians for the Oneness of Allah is His Saying: "Had
there been in either (Heaven or earth) gods besides Allah, both would have
surely gone to ruin." Their greatest proof for the prophecy is, "And if you are
in doubt as to that which We have sent down to our worshiper (Prophet Muhammad),
then produce a chapter like it." Their greatest proof for the resurrection is,
"Say: He shall give life to them Who originated them at first." And so on of the
rest of the verses and the proofs.
Thus the prophets - the praise of Allah be upon them - did not cease to debate with the unbelievers and dispute with them. Allah said, "Dispute with them in the kindest manner." The Companions - may Allah be pleased with them - too used to debate and dispute with the unbelievers, but only when necessary. During the time of the Companions the need for disputation was minimal. The first to establish the precedence of summoning innovators back to truth by means of debate and argument was 'Ali ibn abi Talib - may Allah be pleased with him - when he sent ibn Abbas to the Kharijites. Ibn Abbas argued with them saying, "What, you rebel against your leader?" They replied, "He has fought, but did not turn the prisoners to be slaves nor took the spoils of war." Ibn Abbas explained to them that prisoners and spoils are taken only in a war against unbelievers, adding, "Would any of you, if Lady A'isha - may Allah be pleased with her - had been taken captive on the Day of the Camel, and if she had fallen to his lot, have deemed it lawful to deal with her as he dealt with his own property while she is referred to in the Koran as your mother?" They answered "No," and consequently two thousand of them returned to be obedient. It was also reported that al Hasan once debated with a Qadarite (who denied predestination) with the result that the latter repented. Similarly, 'Ali ibn Abi Talib - may Allah honor his face - also debated with a Qadarite.
It is also reported that 'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud - may Allah be pleased with him -
debated with Yazid ibn 'Amirah on the subject of belief. 'Abdullah said: "If I
say that I am a believer it will be like saying that I am in Paradise."
Thereupon Yazid ibn 'Amirah said to him, "O Companion of the Messenger of Allah,
what is belief except to believe in Allah, His angels, Books and Messengers, as
well as in resurrection and the scales, and to perform the prayers, keep the
fast, and pay the obligatory charity. Yet we have sins which, if we knew that
they will be forgiven us, we would know that we will be of the people of
Paradise. For this reason we say that we are believers, but we do not say that
we are from the people of Paradise." Ibn Mas'ud replied, "By Allah, you have
said the truth; this was a mistake on my part." Thus it should be said that the
Companions immersed little in the debating and this they did for a short time
and not as a long time necessity nor by the way of authorship, teaching it or
taking it as a profession. Furthermore this limiting practicing on their part
was due to little need for it as innovation did not appear in their time.
They addressed themselves to it briefly because their only purpose was to
silence the adversary and compel him to admit his error; they aimed at revealing
the truth and removing dubiosities. Yet, whenever the confusion of the adversary
persisted or he insisted in continuing in error, they prolonged their argument,
never reckoning, as it were once they started they could not measure the need or
Their not applying themselves to teaching and writing about it is not unlike their custom with regard to jurisprudence, interpretation of Koran, and prophetic quotations. Therefore, if it is permissible to compose books on jurisprudence and to work out rare hypothetical cases which seldom arise, either as a preparation for the time when it is needed, or simply to sharpen the wits. It is also permissible for us to classify the methods of disputation in preparation for the time when dubiosities flare up or an innovator runs loose; or simply to sharpen the wits or have the argument ready so that when needed it will be within reach of all just as the preparation of armaments for war before the day of battle.
This is practically all that can be said on behalf of the two groups (the proponents and the opponents of dogmatic theology).
You should know then, that first of all a thing, such as wine or carrion, may be pronounced unlawful from its very nature. What I mean by 'its very nature' is that the cause of its being pronounced unlawful is a quality inherent in it. Intoxication and death. If we were asked concerning these two things, we would not hesitate to say that they were absolutely unlawful, and would in no way think of allowing carrion to be eaten in time of desperation, nor ever think of permitting the drinking of wine when a person starts to choke over a mouthful of food and finds nothing with which to swallow it besides wine.
In the second place a thing may be pronounced unlawful for some other reason,
such as underselling your Muslim brother during the period of option, trading
during the call to prayer, or eating earth which is pronounced unlawful because
of its harmful effect. Such things are divided into those which are harmful both
in small and large quantities, and are therefore pronounced unlawful. For
example, poison which is fatal whether in small or large quantity; and those
which are harmful only when taken in excess like, for example, honey, which can
be harmful to a feverish patient. The same is true of eating earth. Therefore,
in pronouncing wine absolutely unlawful, only the most general cases were taken
into consideration. In the event that something new arises, it will be well to
consider the detailing.
We return now to the science of scholastic theology to say that it has benefits and harm.
With regard to its usefulness whenever it is useful it is either lawful, commendable, or obligatory, as the occasion demands. As to its harm, whenever it is harmful it is unlawful. Its harm lies in raising doubts and undermining the articles of faith by moving them out from the realm of certitude and determination. These things are happening at the beginning and their restoration by means of proof is doubtful. Furthermore, it varies with the individual. Therefore it is true that it is harmful to the faith. Yet it has another harmful influence which manifests itself in confirming the belief of the heretics in their heresies and establishing them in their hearts so that their claims increase and their insistence on them becomes more stubborn. This kind of harm, however, results from the fanaticism which disputation arouses. For this reason you find that the lay heretic can, through kindness, be easily dissuaded from his error in no time. But if he were brought up in a town where disputation and fanaticism abound it will be impossible for both the past and current generation to remove the heresy from his heart, their combined efforts notwithstanding. On the contrary, passion, fanaticism, hatred of the adversaries of disputation and non-conformist groups prevail over his heart and prevent him from comprehending the truth so that even if he were told, "Do you want Allah to remove for you the veil and to reveal to you through seeing that the truth is on the side of your adversary?" he would dislike it for fear that his adversary would be gladened by it. This, then, is the chronic disease which has spread among men all over the land. It is a kind of corruption which is set in motion by the disputants through their fanaticism. That is its harm.
As to its benefits some think that it is useful in revealing realities and
knowing them as they really are. But how far from the truth this is, because the
fulfillment of noble desire is not found in disputation. In fact the perplexity
and confusion consequent on disputation surpass anything which it may reveal or
unfold. If you were to hear that from a scholar of the prophetic quotations or a
semi-scholar you would think that men are the enemies of that of which they are
Take it, then, from one who has familiarized himself with disputation and, after a careful study and a thorough investigation of it in which he surpassed the extreme limits of its masters and went even further to study in great detail other cognate subjects, has come to dislike it, and has ascertained that the road to the realities of knowledge is closed from this direction. Disputation, as a matter of fact, will inevitably reveal, unfold and clarify a few things, but this is very rare and only occurs in simple and clear matters which are readily understood even before any thorough study of the art of disputation. It has only one benefit. It preserves the belief for the ordinary people and safeguards it against the confusion of innovators by different kinds of argumentation. For the layman is swayed by the argument of the innovator although the argument may be false; and to confront a false position with another refutes it. People are expected to follow this belief which we have already mentioned because the Religion has ordained it for the good of their temporal and spiritual lives and because the good early generations agreed on it.
The learned are expected to watch over it for the ordinary people against the ambiguities of the innovators, just as the magistrates are expected to safeguard their property against the attacks of the oppressors and ravishers. When both its harm and benefit are fully understood, one should be like the physician who is adept in the use of dangerous drugs, which he does not apply except to the right place and only at the time of desparation. To explain further, the laymen and the ordinary people who are engaged in crafts and trades should be left alone in the integrity of their beliefs which they have accepted when they were instructed in the faith which we have already stated. To teach them disputation is decidedly harmful to them as it will perhaps arouse doubts in their minds which will shake their belief. Once these doubts are aroused it will not be possible to remedy their shaken belief.
As to the layman who believes in a certain innovation, he should be called back
to the truth with kindness and tact and not with fanaticism, with soft words
which are convincing to the soul and effective in the heart, words similar to
those of the arguments of the Koran and the prophetic quotations, mixed with a
little admonition and warning. This is much better than debate along the line
set down by the scholastic theologians. This is because the layman, when he
hears such arguments, thinks that they are a kind of technique in disputation
which the disputant has learned in order to draw men to his belief.
Consequently, if the layman fails to reply to these arguments he will assume
that the scholastic theologians of his school are capable of refuting them.
Disputation with both this man and the former is unlawful.
Likewise it is unlawful to argue with one who has fallen victim to doubt, since
doubt should be removed with kindness by admonition and understandable proofs
free of excessive speculation and endless debate. In fact disputation is useful
in only one case, namely, when the layman has been persuaded to believe in an
innovation through one kind of argument, in which case it should be countered by
the same kind of argument in order to recall the person to the truth. This,
however, applies to those who - because of their fondness of disputation - are
no longer satisfied with the ordinary admonitions and warnings, but have reached
a stage where nothing will cure them except debate. Consequently it is
permissible to argue with them. But in a country where heresy is rare and one
rite prevails, it should be sufficient to state the articles of faith which we
have already mentioned, without any attempt to take up the question of proofs.
The person should wait until something questionable arises before he takes up
the question of proofs which he should present according to the need. If the
heresy were a common one and a fear existed that the children might be beguiled
with it, then there would be no harm in teaching them the equivalent of what we
have included in part of this book entitled "The Jerusalem Message" (al-Risalah
al- Qudsiyah), as a means for overcoming the influence of the disputations of
innovators if that influence should confront the children.
This is a brief thing which we included in this book because of its brevity. If
the child were bright and therefore became aware of a certain question or grew
skeptical of something in his mind, then the feared disease has appeared and the
malady has become visible. There will be no harm, then, to promote the child to
the equivalent of that which we have included in the book entitled al-lqtisad fi
al-I'tiqad (The Mid-way Belief), which is free from any departures from a
discussion of the foundations of the articles of faith to the other
investigations of the scholastic theologians. If this convinces the child then
he might be left alone; but if this should fail to convince him, then the
disease has become chronic, the malady rooted, and the epidemic widespread. Let,
then, the physician be as kind and tactful as possible, and let him await the
Will of Allah until, through His Grace, the truth shall be revealed to the
child. Otherwise he will persist in his doubt and skepticism.
The material contained in that book and others of the same kind is that from
which benefit can be expected. Chapters not confined to the same subject are of
The first comprises chapters which deal with subjects other than the foundations of the articles of faith, such as those which discuss propensity, transmutations and the different kinds of perceptions or discoursing on sight, whether or not it has an opposite which is called obstruction or blindness. If this obstruction does exist, then it will be an obstruction (which prevents the eye) from (seeing) all invisible things, or a proof which verifies every visible thing that can be seen, as well as other misleading trivialities. The second kind of these chapters contains a further expansion of the same arguments as applied to other subjects, together with several questions and answers - details which add nothing but confusion and perplexity to him who has not already been convinced by the previous material. For there are certain things which become more obscure with dilation and expansion. If one were to say that the investigation into the rules of perceptions and propensities is useful for sharpening the mind which is the instrument of Religion just as the sword is the instrument of Holy war (jihad), hence there is no harm in sharpening it, it will be like saying that playing chess, because it sharpens the mind, is a part of Religion. This, however, is insane because the mind may be sharpened through the other sciences of the Religion in which there is no fear of harm or injury.
By this you see how much of scholastic theology is blameworthy and how much is praiseworthy, the conditions wherein it is condemned and these wherein it is praised, as well as the persons who are benefited by it and the persons who are harmed. If you should then say that, since you acknowledge the need for it in refuting the arguments of the innovators, and since innovations have now risen and calamities spread, the need for it has become urgent, it is inevitable that undertaking this science should become an Islamic public mandate just as undertaking to safeguard property and other rights and fulfilling the duties of justice and government and the rest. And unless the learned men engage in spreading and teaching this science and in making research in it, it will not endure; and if it were completely abandoned, it would surely disappear; nor is there in human nature by itself a sufficient ability to cut through the dubiosities of innovators unless this subject is learnt and studied. Therefore there should be instruction in it, and its investigation is now one of the Islamic public mandate, contrary to what it was at the time of the Companions when the need for it was not urgent.
If you should say this, then know that the truth of the matter is that undoubtedly there should be, in every town, someone who would undertake to engage in this science and take it upon himself to refute the dubiosities of the innovators which have spread in that particular town. This undertaking is performed through education, but it is not wise to instruct the laity in it just as they are instructed in jurisprudence and interpretation. For this is like a drug, and jurisprudence is like food. The harm of food is not dangerous but the harm of drugs is dangerous as we have already mentioned. The learned people of this science should confine their instruction to men who have the three following traits: The first is devotion to knowledge and passion for it; for the working man is prevented by his work from mastering the subject completely and from dispelling doubts when they arise. The second trait is sagacity, intelligence, and eloquence, because those with lessor intellect do not benefit by his understanding and the dull one does not gain by his argument. On the contrary such a person is injured by disputation and should not expect any good from it.
The third trait is that the man should by nature be good, religious, and pious; he should not be dominated by passions, because the sinful man would stray from Religion at the least provocation. Passions would do away with all deterrents and remove the barrier which stands between him and worldly pleasures. He would not be keen on dispelling anything questionable, but rather would seize upon it to free himself from any obligation. The things which such a student will spoil would be greater than those which he would reform.
When you know these divisions you would realize that, in disputation the
praiseworthy argument is of the same kind as the arguments of the Koran, kind
words which influence the hearts and convince the minds without going deeply
into reasoning and analyses which most people do not understand; and whenever
they understand them they consider them trickeries and artifices which their
proponent has learnt in order to make things ambiguous. Should he be confronted
by one of his professional colleagues he would resist him.
You will also know that al Shafi' and all the good, early generation were
forbidden from engaging in disputation and devoting themselves exclusively to
it, because of the harm inherent in it which we have already pointed out. The
reports of ibn Abbas' debate with the Kharijites and Ali's debate concerning
free will was of the clear and intelligent kind, carried out at the time of
need. Such disputation is praiseworthy under all conditions.
Undoubtedly the need for disputation differs with the time; therefore it is not
unlikely that the rule which governs it should also differ. This then is the
rule of the creed which Allah imposed on mankind and the method of defending and
As to dispelling doubts, revealing truths, knowing things as they really are, and comprehending the mysteries which the words of this belief signify, there is no way to attain any of them except through self-mortification and the subduing of passions, through seeking Allah whole heartedly and persisting in thoughts which are free from the blemishes of disputation. They are a mercy from Allah which comes to those who expose themselves to its beneficence according to what Allah ordained for them and the extent to which they had exposed themselves to it as well as the capacity of their hearts and the degree of their purity. This is the sea the depth of which cannot be sounded and the waters of which cannot be traversed.
Sahl al-Tustari - may Allah be pleased with him - said, "The learned person
possesses three kinds of knowledge: visible knowledge which he imparts to people
in general; invisible knowledge which he cannot reveal except to its own people;
and finally a confidential knowledge which lies between him and His Lord and
which he cannot reveal to anyone." One of the gnostics said, "To divulge the
secret of the Lord is equivalent to unbelief." Some one also said, "The Lord has
a secret, if revealed, prophecy will become obsolete. Prophecy has a secret, if
divulged, knowledge will become useless, and the learned people of Allah have a
secret, if disclosed, the Religion will become of no force." If he who had said
this did not mean thereby the futility of prophecy as far as those with lessor
intellect are concerned because of their inability to understand, then what he
said is not true. Rather, that which is true is free of contradiction. The
perfect man is he whose knowledge does not destroy his piety, and the road to
piety is through the prophecy.
You may say, "These verses and prophetic quotations may be subject to several interpretations. Show us, then, how their visible meaning differs from the invisible. For if the visible is contradictory to the invisible, it will destroy the Religion, which is exactly the position of those who say that reality is contrary of the Religion. This is unbelief because the Religion represents the visible and reality represents the invisible. If the one is neither contradictory to, nor in disagreement with the other, then both are identical. Therefore the division (of knowledge into obvious and hidden, visible and invisible) is hereby destroyed and the Religion will have no secret (meaning) which should not be divulged. Rather both the hidden and the obvious will be the same." If you inquire, then you should know that this question raises a grave issue and leads into the science of Revelation departing from the intent of the science of practical Religion which is the purpose of these books. For the articles of faith which we have already mentioned come under the deeds of the heart which we are required to receive with acceptance and consent, by fixing the heart on them and adhering to them, not by endeavoring to comprehend their realities, since this was not required of all people. Were it not a part of practical Religion we would not have mentioned it in this book, and were it not one of the outward deeds of the heart we would not have mentioned it in the first half of the book. Real (and complete) revelation is an attribute of the essence of the heart and its inward part. But if the discussion leads to the stirring up of doubt or the shadow of doubt concerning the contradiction of the visible to the invisible, a brief word of explanation becomes necessary. For he who says that reality disagrees with the Religion and the invisible contradicts the visible is closer to unbelief than to belief.
The first is that the thing in itself is subtle and beyond the comprehension of
most hearts and minds. Consequently its comprehension is restricted to the elite
who should not divulge it to those who are unable to grasp it lest, whenever
their hearts fail to comprehend it or to understand the concealed secrets of the
spirit, it becomes a calamity to them.
The Prophet himself refrained from explaining this part. The minds fail to comprehend its reality and the imaginations to imagine its truth. But do not think that this was not revealed to the Prophet of Allah - the praise and peace be upon him - for he who does not know the spirit does not know himself, and he who does not know himself does not know his Creator. It is not unlikely that this was revealed to some of the people who are close to Allah and the learned men although they were not prophets; but they disciplined themselves in the etiquette of the Religion and held their peace in the matters where the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - himself was silent. In fact there are in the attributes of Allah many hidden things which are beyond the comprehension and understanding of the crowds. Of these, the Prophet of Allah - the praise and peace be upon him - did not mention anything except those that are obvious to the minds, such as knowledge and power and the like, which men understand in terms of something akin to them and then suppose that they performed the feat through their own knowledge and power, especially since they possess certain qualities which are called knowledge and power. Consequently they arrive at that by some manner of analogy. But if the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - mentioned some of the attributes of Allah to which men have nothing akin and which do not resemble, even remotely, anything they possess, they would not have understood them. Thus, the pleasure of coition, if mentioned to the child or to the impotent, will not be understood by them except in relation to the pleasure of eating which they comprehend. This understanding, however, will not be one of actual experience. Furthermore, the difference between the Knowledge and Power of Allah and human knowledge and power is greater than the difference between the pleasure of coition and the pleasure of eating. In short, mankind does not comprehend except themselves and their own attributes which are present with them or were with him in the past. By comparison and analogy with these they understand the attributes of others. They will also realize that there is a difference between their attributes and those of Allah in nobleness and perfection. Therefore it is not within the power of people but to declare as belonging to Allah what has been declared as belonging to themselves, such as action, knowledge, and power as well as other attributes and to acknowledge that in Allah they are the most perfect and the most noble. Most of their emphasis would, therefore, be on their own attributes rather than on those of Majesty which belong exclusively to Allah.
For this reason the Prophet said, "I cannot count praising You as You have praised Yourself. "This does not mean the inability to express what I comprehend but rather an admission of the inability to comprehend the Essence of the Majesty of Allah. For this reason again someone said: "No one truly knows Allah except Allah Himself." Abu-Bakr al-Siddiq said, "Praise be to Allah who has not given men a way to know Him except through their inability to know Him." Let us now, however, stop this kind of discussion and go back to the main purpose, namely that one of these categories comprises that which the minds fail to comprehend, such as the spirit and some of the attributes of Allah. Perhaps the Prophet refered to something of the same nature when he said, "His cover is Light, if He reveals it, indeed, the Exaltation of His Face will burn everything of His creation that His Sight reaches." (Darwish notes: Christians are taught to believe and surrender their limited reason and trust God. The same applies to Muslim scholars who believe in the limitation of the brain and trust Allah and His Messengers so the question remains: "Is there proof that God has a son which came from Him Himself?" The answer in both Islam's Koran and authentic, early Christian literature is that He does not. In the Koran you will find a denial of such claim and that Allah told Prophet Muhammad to tell the world "If the Merciful has a son, indeed I will be the first one to worship him." Therefore the rejection is not based upon malice or even the limitation of the brain that it fails to comprehend, but it is based upon clear revelation which should be considered by all.)
The second category of the hidden things which the prophets and the people who are close to Allah decline to mention or divulge comprises those things which are intelligible in themselves and the minds do not fail to grasp, but their mention is harmful to most hearers although it is not harmful to the prophets and the people who are close to Allah.
The secret of the decrees of Allah which the learned men were forbidden to divulge belongs to this part. Consequently it is not unlikely that certain truths may be harmful to some people just as the light of the sun is harmful to the eyes of bats and the perfume of the rose is harmful to black-beetles. And how could this be deemed unlikely when we know that our saying that unbelief, adultery, sin, and evil exist all by the Will of Allah, which in itself is true, but, nevertheless, has been harmful to many because it was taken by them as an evidence for folly, lack of wisdom, and approval of evil and wickedness? Thus has al-Rawandi as well as several separatists, deviated from the right path by following such heresies.
Similarly, if the secret of the decrees of Allah were divulged most people would fancy that Allah is lacking in power, because their minds are incapable of comprehending anything which will remove that fancy.
Furthermore, if someone should discuss the Day of Resurrection and should say that it will fall after a thousand years, or a few years after or a few years before, his words would be understood. Nevertheless the appointed time of the Day of Resurrection was not foretold for the welfare of mankind and for fear of the harm which might ensue. The (intervening) period may be long and the appointed time very distant, with the result that people, thinking that the Day of Recompense is remote, would cease to mind or care. On the other hand it may be, in the Knowledge of Allah, close at hand. If then, the appointed time should be foretold, people would be greatly frightened with the result that they would neglect their (daily) work and transactions and havoc would overtake the world. Were this to occur and come true, it would be an example of this category.
The third category is where the thing is such as will be understood and cause no
harm when mentioned clearly, although it is usually expressed through metaphor
or allegory so that its impression on the heart of the listener may be deeper.
Its value is that it leaves a greater impression on the heart. Thus if a person
had said that he had seen a man place pearls around the necks of swine and his
words were taken metaphorically to express the imparting of knowledge, and the
spread of learning among those who are unworthy, the (ordinary) listener would
readily understand its literal meaning while the thorough and careful listener,
when he examines and finds that the man had no pearls and was not surrounded by
swine, would see through and comprehend the inner and invisible meaning.
Consequently men differ in this respect. An example of this found in the
following poem: Two men, one a weaver the other a tailor on either side of
Constellation of Virgo; One is weaving shrouds for the deceased, and his
companion tailors for the forthcoming one.
The poet expressed the celestial phenomena of the rising of the stars and their
setting metaphorically through the parable of two artisans. This kind of
(metaphor) belongs to the principle of expressing a certain meaning through a
picture which contains the same meaning or a similar meaning.
Belonging to the same kind are the words of the Prophet when he said, "Verily
the mosque will shrink when people spit in its courtyard just as the piece of
skin shrinks when it is placed over the fire." You can readily understand that
the courtyard of the mosque does not actually shrink when people spit in it.
What the words of the Prophet really mean is that the atmosphere of the mosque,
being honored and exalted, has been dishonored and belittled by spitting, which
is as opposed to the idea of the mosque as fire is to the integrity of the
particles of skin.
Belonging to the same kind are the words of the Prophet when he said, "Is he who raises his head from prostration before the prayer leader not afraid that Allah will transform his head into that of a donkey?" This, however, will never take place literally but only metaphorically since the head of the donkey is proverbial, not for its form and shape, but for its characteristic stupidity and foolishness. Thus, whoever would raise his head from prostration before the prayer leader, his head would become like that of a donkey in stupidity and foolishness. It is this which is meant and not the shape which the literal meaning (of the words) indicates. For it is utterly foolish to place following (the prayer leader) and preceding (him) together because they are contradictory.
The knowledge that, in such cases, there are inner meanings which differ from
the outward significations, can only be determined by either rational or legal
evidence. The rational is when any interpretation according to the outward
meaning is impossible, as in the words of the Prophet - the praise and peace be
upon him - when he said: "The heart of the believer lies between two of the
fingers of the Merciful (Allah)." When we examine the hearts of the believers we
shall not find them surrounded with fingers, and consequently we shall know that
the words are used metaphorically for power which is inherent in fingers and
constitutes their hidden life. Furthermore, power was metaphorically represented
by the fingers because such a metaphor conveys the idea of power more
Of the same kind is the instance where Allah expresses the idea of His Power metaphorically by saying: "When We decree a thing, We only say: 'Be,' and it is." (Ch.16:40 Koran) The outward meaning of this verse is not possible because if the saying of Allah 'Be' was addressed to the thing before that thing came into existence, then it would simply be an impossibility since the non-existent does not understand address and, therefore, cannot obey. And if it was addressed to the thing after the thing has come into existence, then it would be superfluous, since the thing is already in existence and does not need to be brought into being. But whereas this metaphor has been more impressive upon the minds in conveying the idea of the greatest power, recourse has been made to it.
Those cases where the inner meaning is determined by means of legal evidence are the cases which can be interpreted according to their literal and outward signification, but, on the authority of prophetic quotations, a meaning other than the outward was intended, as is the case in the interpretation of the Words of Allah when He said, "He sends down water from the sky which fills the riverbeds to overflowing, so that their torrents carries a swelling foam..." (Ch.13:17 Koran). Here the word water stands for the Koran and the torrents represent the hearts. Some of the hearts receive and hold a lot; others receive a lot and hold little; while others still receive a lot and hold nothing at all. The foam represents unbelief and hypocrisy, which, although it rises to and floats upon the surface of the water, does not last; but guidance which benefits mankind, endures.
In this part a group of men went deeply and interpreted the things which were mentioned in connection with the Hereafter, such as the balance, the Bridge, and the like. All this, however, is innovation because it was not handed down by prophetic quotations, especially since its literal and outward interpretation is not impossible. Therefore it should be interpreted literally. The fourth category is where a person comprehends the thing in a general way and then through further investigation and experimentation, understands its particulars so that it becomes a part of him. Thus the two kinds of knowledge differ. The first, (i.e. the general) resembles the husks, while the second (i.e. the particular), resembles the pith. The first is the visible or outward, the second is the invisible or inward. This is just like the example of the man who sees a person in the dark or from a distance and acquires a certain picture of that person. But when he sees him from a close range or after the darkness has gone, he realizes certain differences. This last picture, however, is not opposed to the first but complementary to it. The same is true of knowledge, faith, and belief. For a person may believe in the existence of love, sickness, and death even before any of them occur. But to believe in their existence after they have taken place is more complete than believing in their existence before they take place. In fact mankind has, with regard to passion and love as well as the other conditions, three different stages and three distinct degrees of comprehension. The first is to believe in the existence of the thing before it takes place; the second is to believe in its existence at the time of its occurrence; and the third is to believe in its existence after it has taken place.
To recognize the existence of hunger after it is gone is different from
recognizing its existence before it is gone. Similarly, there are some of the
sciences of Religion which mature by experience and their mature state as
compared with their premature state is like the invisible as compared to the
visible. Hence there is a difference between the sick man's knowledge of health
and the healthy man's knowledge of it. In short, people differ in these four
parts; yet in none of them is there an invisible meaning which contradicts the
visible. Rather the invisible meaning completes and perfects the visible just as
the pith completes the husk.
The fifth category is where concrete words are used figuratively. Those with lessor intellect will regard the literal and visible meaning sensible and will not go beyond it; but the man who has an insight for realities will comprehend the secret it contains. This is like the words of him who said, "The wall said to the peg, 'why do you split me?' The peg replied 'Ask the one who is hitting me and does not let me go. Go and see the mallet which is behind me.'" This is, undoubtedly, figurative.
Of the same kind are the following Words of Allah, "Then He willed to the heaven, when it was smoke, and to it and to the earth He said: 'Come willingly, or unwillingly.' 'We come willingly,' they answered." (Ch.41:11 Koran). Those with lesser intellect, because of their lack of understanding, would assume that both the Heaven and the earth possess life intellect, and the ability to understand speech. He would also assume that they were addressed by a speech of actually enunciated words which both could hear and reply to with enunciated words saying, "We come willingly." But whosoever has insight would realize that this was a figurative (use of language) and that Allah only expressed that the Heaven and earth are subject to His Will. Of the same kind, too, are the Words of Allah when He said, "There is nothing that does not proclaim His Praise..." (Ch.17:46 Koran). Those with lesser intellect, because of their lack of understanding, would assume that the inanimate things possess life intellect, and the ability to speak and enunciate words, so that they would have to say, "Praise is to Allah" in order that His Praise might be established. But he who has insight would know that the actual utterance with the tongue was not meant by that but merely that everything, through its own existence, praises Allah, and in its own essence exalts Him and attests to His Oneness. As has been said: "In everything He has a sign which declares that He is One." In the same way it is said, "This masterpiece testifies that its Maker possesses the ability and perfect knowledge." This does not mean that the masterpiece actually utter the words, "I testify ..." etc. but merely that, through its form and state, (it testifies to the Ability and Knowledge of its Maker).
Similarly everything does, in itself, stand in need of the Creator to create and sustain it, to maintain its attributes and to move it to and fro in its different states. And through its need it testifies to its Maker by Exalting Him. Such a witness is comprehended by those who have insight, not those who stand still and do not venture beyond the externals. For this reason Allah said, "But you do not understand their extolling." (Ch.17:46 Koran). Those with lessor intellect do not understand this at all, while the favorites of Allah and the versatile learned men do not understand it perfectly because everything extols Allah and praises Him in many ways and each comprehends according to his intellect and insight.
The enumeration of these witnesses is not becoming under the science of practical Religion. In this part too those who cling to externals differ from those who have insight, and in it the disagreement between the visible and the invisible becomes evident.
The Mu'tazilites go further. They explain away the possibility of seeing Allah
and His being possessed of hearing and sight. They also explain away the
ascension (al mi'raj) of the Prophet and claim that it had not taken place
bodily, the punishment of the grave, the balance, the Bridge, and other
eschatological representations. Nevertheless they confess the resurrection of
the body, Paradise with its food, perfume, and sex as well as other sensual
pleasures, and Hell with burning fires which scorch the skin and melt the fat.
The philosophers (who invaded all the branches of today's Christianity) go still
further. They interpret all eschatological representations as allegories
denoting mental and spiritual pain, and mental and spiritual delight. They deny
the resurrection of the body but believe in the immortality of the soul and that
it will be punished or made happy by punishment and delight of non-sensual
nature. They are extremists.
The true middle-road (called Asharia after Imam Abul Hasan Al Ashari) between this complete allegorism and the rigidity of the Hanbalites is subtle and obscure. It is found only by those who enjoy Divine Guidance and comprehend things by the aid of Divine Light, not by hearsay. Then when the mysteries of things are revealed to them, so that they see them as they are, they go back to the Koran and prophetic quotations and their wording; whatever agrees with what they see with the light of certainty they affirm, and whatever disagrees with it they interpret allegorically. But he who bases his knowledge of these things on mere hearsay will thereby fail to secure a firm foothold or gain a well defined position therein. Such a man who confines himself to mere hearsay would do better to follow the position of Ahmad ibn Hanbal. But a closer examination and definition of the middle-road position in these things belongs to the vast subject of revelation which we must leave aside.
Our aim was only to make clear that the invisible and visible may be in harmony
with one another and that no disagreement exists between them. At any rate many
things have been unfolded through our discussion of these five parts.
It is our opinion that for the common people the explanation of the faith which
we have already given is sufficient for them and that nothing further will be
required of them in the first degree. But if any fear of disturbances arises on
account of the spread of heresies, then, in the second degree, recourse may be
had to a statement of the belief wherein a brief and undetailed outline of the
obvious proofs is presented.
We shall, therefore, present these obvious proofs in this book and shall confine ourselves therein to what we have issued to the people of Jerusalem, entitled al Risalah al Qudsiyah fi Qawa'id al 'Aqa'id (The Jerusalem Epistle on the Foundations of the Articles of Faith) and included in the following third section of this book.
It is with His Grace that He led them to follow the example of the Master of the Messengers; who directed their footsteps in the way of his honored companions and enabled them to emulate the good, early generations, so that they protected themselves with the strong cord against the dictates of reason, and (to emulate) the lives and beliefs of the ancients with the clear method, combining thereby the products of reason and the ordinances of the religion. Furthermore they found out that mere verbal repetition of the words "There is no god except Allah; Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah" is of no avail unless they completely understand what the fundamentals of the witness involve of principle and pillars. They also have known that the two witnessing phrases, despite their brevity, contain an affirmation of the existence of Allah Himself, His Attributes, and His Deeds, as well as an affirmation of the truthfulness of the Messenger - the praise and peace be upon him - And they also knew that establishing the faith upon these pillars, which are four, each one having ten principles: The first pillar concerning the knowledge of the Essence of Allah - the High - consists of ten principles. They are: 1. The knowledge that Allah - the High - exists. 2. He is Ancient 3. He is Everlasting. 4. He is not a substance. 5. He is not a body. 6. He is not a quality of a body (accident). 7. He is not subject to a direction. 8. He is not resident in a place. 9. He is seen. 10. He is One.
The second pillar concerns the attributes of Allah: It comprises of ten
principles. They are the knowledge that:
1. He is Alive.
2. He is Knowledgeable. 3. He is Powerful. 4. He is the Willer. 5. He is the Hearer. 6. He is the Seer. 7. He is the Speaker. 8. His Essence is Exalted to contain a creation (a substratum for originated properties or a locus of phenomena). 9. His Words are ancient and eternal. 10. His Knowledge is ancient and eternal as His Will. The third pillar concerns the Deeds of Allah: it consists of ten principles: 1. The actions of mankind are created by Allah - the High -. 2. They are gained by the creation. 3. They are willed by Allah - the High -. 4. Allah has been Gracious by creation and invention. 5. Allah is free to impose unbearable obligations. 6. Allah is free to punish the innocent. 7. While taking into consideration that which is best is not obligatory upon Him. 8. That there is nothing obligatory except by the Religion. 9. His sending of prophets is possible (not an obligation upon Him). 10. The prophecy of our Prophet Muhammad - the praise and peace be upon him - is true being confirmed by miracles. The fourth pillar is concerning heard verses and the prophetic quotations mentioning the unseen. And consist of ten principles: 1. The affirmation of the assembly on the Day of Recompense. 2. The accounting. 3. The questioning (of the dead by the angels) Munkar and Nakeer. 4. The punishment of the grave. 5. The balance. 6. The Bridge over Hell. 7. The creation of Paradise and Hell. 8. The ruling of the imamate (Caliphate). 9. The excellence of the Companions is in accordance with the chronological order. 10. The conditions of the imamate (caliphate).
The first among the pillars of belief is the knowledge of the Essence of Allah - the Exalted, the High - and that Allah - the High - is One.
It consists of ten principles:
The first light which should be used for illumination and the first thing to be followed on the road of admonition are the instructions of the Koran, because there is no explanation beyond that of Allah - the Exalted -. Allah says in the Koran: "Have We not made the earth a cradle and the mountains as pegs? And We created you in pairs, and We made your sleep a rest, and We made the night a mantle, and We made the day for a livelihood. And We built above you seven strong ones, and placed in them a blazing lamp and have sent down from the clouds pouring rain that We may bring forth with it grain and plants and luxuriant gardens." (Ch.78:6-16). And again, "Assuredly in the creation of the Heaven and of the Earth; and in the alternation of night and day; and in the ships which pass through the sea with what is useful to man; and in the rain which Allah sends down from Heaven, giving life by it to the earth after its death, and by scattering over it all kinds of cattle; and in the change of the winds, and in the clouds that are compelled between the Heaven and the Earth; are signs for those who understand." He - the High - also said: "Have you not seen how Allah created the seven heavens one above the other, setting in them the moon as a light and the sun as a lantern? Allah has caused you to grow from the earth, and to it He will return you. Then He will bring you forth." (Ch.71:15-18). And He - the High - said: "Have you seen what you ejaculate? Did you create it, or are We the Creator? It was We that decreed death among you. We will not be outstripped that We will charge you and cause you to grow again in a fashion you do not know. You have surely known the first creation. Why then, will you not remember! Consider the soil you till. Is it you that sow it, or are We the Sower? If We will, We would make it broken orts and you would remain wondering. (Saying:) 'We are laden with debts! Rather, we have been prevented!' Consider the water which you drink. Is it you that send it down from the clouds or We? If We will, We would make it bitter, why then do you not give thanks? Consider the fire which you kindle. Is it you that originated its tree, or are We the Originator?" (Ch.56:58-72 Koran). Anyone with the least bit of intellect is able to reflect upon the import of these verses and reviewing the wonders of the creation of Allah, in Heaven and on earth as well as the beauties of nature in animal and plant, realizes that this wonderful matter with its consummate order cannot be independent from the Creator to direct it and the Maker to govern it and quantify it. Therefore Allah - the High - said: "Is there any doubt about Allah, the Creator of the heavens and the earth?" (Ch.14:10). The prophets - the praise of Allah be upon them - were, therefore, sent in order to call the creation to the Oneness, that they may say, "There is no god except Allah." They were not, however, commanded to say, "We have a god and the world has a god," because such a thing is inborn in their minds from the time of their birth and in the midst of their youth.
For this reason Allah - the High, the Glorified - said: "If you ask them: 'Who has created the heavens and the earth?' They will reply: 'Allah.'... (Ch.31:25 Koran). And He - the High - said: "Therefore set your face to the Religion, purely, the upright creation upon which He originated people there is no changing of the creation of Allah, this is the valuable religion." (Ch.31:30 Koran). Therefore there is in human nature and the testimonies of the Koran what will render the task of citing proof unnecessary.
The third principle is the knowledge that Allah, besides being without
beginning, His Existence has no end.
He is the First and the Last, the Visible and the Invisible, since that whose eternity is established His end is impossible. Its proof lies in the realization that if it came to nothing it is inevitable that it should come to nothing either by Himself or by an opponent.
And if it were possible for a thing, which is conceived of as self-subsisting, to come to nothing, it will be possible for a thing, which is conceived of as self- annihilating, to come into being. And just as the sudden emergence of existence requires a cause, so does the emergence of extinction require a cause. That it will come to nothing through an opposing annihilating agency is false, because if that annihilating agency were ancient, existence side by side with it would be inconceivable. But we have learnt in the two previous principles of His Existence and His Eternity. How did He exist together with the claimed opponent in eternity? If, however, the annihilating opponent were an originated phenomenon, its existence from eternity would be impossible because for the originated phenomenon to oppose the ancient and destroy its existence is less likely than the ancient to oppose the originated and prevent its existence. In fact prevention is easier than destruction while the ancient is stronger and more pre-eminent than the originated.
Therefore the directions are originated through the creation of man; and had he
not been created along these lines, but rather created round like a sphere,
these directions would never have existed.
How then could Allah have been subject to a direction in eternity when every
direction is originated. Or how could He have become subject to a direction when
He never had any direction above Him when He created man; for that will mean
that He has a head, since above designates the direction above the head. But
Allah is far Exalted (above His creatures) to have a head. Again how could He
have become subject to a direction when He never had any direction below Him
when He created mankind; for that will mean that He has feet, since below
designates the direction below the feet. Allah is far Exalted (above His
creatures) to have feet. All this is too impossible (to imagine) in the mind.
For whatever the mind conceives is definite in so far as it is limited by place,
in the same way as substances are limited, or by substances, in the same way as
their qualities are. But the impossibility of His being a substance or its
quality has been established - consequently His being subject to a direction
If therefore anything else is meant by the term direction other than these two meanings then the usage will be wrong in terminology and signification; because if Allah were above the world He would be opposite to it, and everything which is opposite to a body is either equal to it in size, or smaller or larger. All this implies measurement which necessarily requires an object or measurement. But Allah the One Creator and Ruler of the world and universe is far Exalted above such things.
As to the raising of hands heaven-wards at the time of supplication it is because Heaven is the direction of supplication and implies a description of the One to whom the supplications are offered, such as Majesty and Grandeur, employing thereby the direction of height to represent the quality of Glory and Exaltation. For Allah is above all in dominion and power.
The eighth principle: That He - the High - "istawa" upon the Throne in the sense
which He willed by that state of equilibrium - a state which is not inconsistent
with the quality of grandeur and to which the symptoms of origination and
annihilation do not permeate. It is exactly what has been meant by the ascension
to Heaven in the Koran when Allah said, "Then He willed to the Heaven, when it
was smoke." (Ch.41:11 Koran). This is only through dominion and power, as the
poet said: "Bishr has gained dominion over Iraq, With neither sword nor shedding
Thus were the people of truth compelled to pursue such a figurative and allegorical interpretation just as the people of the invisible knowledge were compelled to interpret His saying - the High -: "He is with you wherever you are" (Ch. 57:4 Koran). This has been taken, by agreement, to mean thorough comprehension and knowledge just as the words of the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - "The heart of the believer lies between two of the fingers of the Merciful (Allah)", have been taken to mean might and power while his words, "The Black Stone is the Right Hand of Allah in the earth," have been taken to mean veneration and honor, because if they were taken literally, the result would have been impossible.
Similarly the "istawa" of Allah upon the Throne, if it were left to mean fixity
of location and stability, would necessitate that He who is seated upon the
Throne is a body touching the Throne, and is either equal to it in size, or
larger or smaller. But all this is impossible, and what leads to the impossible
is itself impossible.
The ninth principle: Is the knowledge that He - the High - although exalted from
form and quantity and exalted above directions and dimensions, is nevertheless
seen with the eyes in the Hereafter, the Everlasting abode. For He said, "On
that Day there shall be radiant faces, gazing towards their Lord." (Ch.74:22-23
Koran). But He cannot be seen in this world according to His saying - the
Mighty, the Glorified -: "No eye can see Him, He sees all eyes" (Ch.6:103
Koran). And according to His Words in addressing Moses - peace be upon him -:
"You shall not see Me." Would that I knew how the Mu'tazilites knew the
attributes of Allah that Moses himself did not know; or how Moses asked to see
Allah when seeing Him was impossible! Ignorance is more likely to be rampant
among heretics and sectarians than among the prophets - the praise of Allah be
upon them -.
As for the reason of taking the verse describing seeing literally it is because it does not lead to the impossible.
For sight is a kind of revelation and knowledge, although it is more complete and clearer than knowledge. And if it is possible to know Allah without reference to direction, it is also possible to see Him without reference to direction. And just as it is possible for Allah to see men without confrontation, it is possible for men to see Him without confrontation; and just as it is possible to know Him without modality or form, it is possible to see Him likewise.
The tenth principle: The knowledge that Allah - the Mighty, the Glorified - is
One without any associate, Single without an equal. He is separate in creating
and innovating; He is alone in bringing into existence and inventing. There are
none like Him to rival or equal Him, and none opposite Him to contest or contend
with Him. The proof is in His saying - the High - "Had there been other gods in
both of them (in Heaven or earth) besides Allah, there would have been ruin."
(Ch.21:22 Koran). And to explain, if there had been two gods and the first of
them willed a certain thing, the second, if he were under compulsion to aid the
first, would be a subordinate and impotent being rather than an almighty god;
and if the second were able to contradict and oppose the first, he would be a
powerful and dominating being while the first would be weak and impotent rather
than an almighty god.
The first principle is the knowledge that the Maker of the world is Almighty and
that He - the High - is Truthful in His saying: "He has power over all things,"
(Ch.5:120 Koran). Because the world is perfect in its making and orderly in its
composition. For he who would see a silk garment, fine in its weave and texture,
symmetrical in its embroidery and ornamentation, and would imagine that it was
woven by a dead person that has no life, or by a helpless person with has no
power, would be completely lacking in intellect and utterly foolish and
The second principle is the knowledge that He - the High - is Knowledgeable,
knowing all things and comprehending all creation; not even the weight of an
atom in Heaven or on earth is ever hidden from His Knowledge. He is truthful in
His saying: "He has knowledge of all things." (Ch.2:29 Koran).
Furthermore evidence of His Truthfulness is found in His Saying - the High -:
"Shall He who has created all things not know? He is the Subtle, the Aware."
(Ch.67:14 Koran). He has led you, through His creation, to comprehend the
knowledge that you cannot doubt in proving the subtleness of creation and
orderly creation, even in insignificant and meager things, offers to the
knowledge of the Maker of how to bring order and how to arrange. And what Allah
- the Exalted - Himself said is the Last Word in guidance and in revealing
The third principle is the knowledge that Allah - the High, the Glorified - is Alive, because he whose knowledge and power are established, his being possessed of life will, of necessity, become established. If it is possible to conceive of the existence of an able, knower, doer and planner yet without life, it will be possible to doubt the life of animals, despite their movements, as well as the life of all craftsmen and artisans, all of which is utter ignorance and error.
The fourth principle is the knowledge that He - the High - is Willing for His
Deeds. And nothing exists which does not depend upon, and proceed from His Will.
He is the Creator, the Restorer, the Doer of whatsoever He wills. And how could
He not be a Willer when, in every deed which has proceeded from Him, its
opposite could have proceeded from Him; for whosoever has no opposite it is
possible that action could proceed from Him by Himself before or after the time
in which it has proceeded.
And it suits His Power both the two opposites and the two times in the same way. Therefore, it is necessary that there should be a Will which directs His Power to one of the two possibilities.
And if Knowledge would, in specifying the known thing, render the Will needless, so that it could be said that a thing has come into being at a time when its existence had already been known (this is not the case otherwise), it would be possible for knowledge to render power needless, so that it could be said that a thing has come into being without Power (which is not the case), but simply because its existence has already been known.
And as understood He is a Doer without limbs and knowledgeable without heart and head, so it could also be understood that He is the Seer without pupil and Hearer without ear as there is no difference between both.
The sixth principle: Is that He - the Exalted, the High - speaks with a speech which is a Self- existing attribute. It is neither a sound nor a letter; it does not resemble the speech of others, just as His Existence does not resemble others. In reality speech is the speech of the self. Sounds were built into words merely as symbols, just as gestures and signals are often used to represent the same thing. How then has this fact not been known by a group of ignorant (theologians) people while it has been known by ignorant poets (of theology).
One of them said: "Speech is in the heart; While the tongue is an indicator for
the heart." As for him whose intellect does neither deter nor restrain him from
saying that his tongue is an originated thing, but what originates in it by
means of his originated power is ancient do not be anxious to rectify his brain
and refrain your tongue from speaking with such a person.
Similarly, you should not direct your heart to him who does not understand that
the Ancient is that nothing existed before Him. And that the letter "n" is
before the letter "a" in the word "Name" so that the letter "a" cannot be
relatively older than the letter "n".
For Allah - the Exalted - has a secret for leading some men astray; "None can guide those whom Allah leads astray." (Ch.13:33 Koran). As for him who deems it improbable that Moses could have, in this world, heard a speech which was neither sound nor letter, let him deny that in the Hereafter he could see His Existence having neither body nor color.
But if it has been possible to conceive that which has no color, or body, or size, or quantity, could be seen. And He is still as He was - never seeing other than Him - similarly, it could be conceived in the sense of hearing what has been conceived in the sense of seeing.
And if it has been possible to conceive of Allah having one knowledge, which is
the knowledge of all existent things, it would also be possible to conceive of
Him having one attribute, which is a speech comprising all that He has
represented with meaning.
And if it has been possible to conceive of the existence of the Seven Heavens, Paradise and Hell, written all on a small piece of paper and preserved in a minute part of the heart, and seen with a part of the pupil not exceeding the size of a lentil seed, without the Heavens and Earth, Paradise and Hell actually existing in the pupil, or the heart, or the paper, it would also be possible to conceive of the Speech of Allah being read with tongues, preserved in the hearts, and written in books, without the actual existence of that speech in these things.
If the fire of Hell, through the writing of its name on the leaves, would exist actually thereon and (the leaves) would be burned, (this is not the case), similarly the very Speech (of Allah) should not actually exist on the leaves of a book, nor Allah Himself, through the writing of His Name on these leaves, would exist in it.
The seventh principle: Is that the Self-existing Speech (of Allah), as well as
His other attributes, is Ancient from eternity, since it is impossible that He
is subject to the substance and its quality (originated phenomena). On the
contrary His attributes obligate the same external nature which His Essence
Change does not overtake Him nor substance or its quality befall Him. No, He does not cease, in His Eternity, to be described with the commendable attributes.
In His Everlasting Eternity, He is far exalted from change. For he who is subject to substance (originated phenomena) cannot be apart from it. And whosoever cannot be apart from substance is a substance (originated phenomena). The description of bodies with the pheonmena's origination was established because of their exposition to changing and alteration of descriptions. How, then, could their Creator share with them the acceptance of change. Accordingly, it is essential that the Speech of Allah is ancient from eternity and it is of His Self-existence. Only the sounds which represent it are originated.
If it is possible to conceive that a father prays for his unborn son to be knowledgeable. Then the child is born with that dormant ability; from which we understand that Allah has created this knowledge in relation to the father's heart. The knowledge exists and remains in the child until he is able to comprehend the knowledge which he has been given. Similarly, it is possible to conceive the standing of the ordinance of Allah which was indicated by the saying of Him - the Mighty, the Glorified - "Take off your sandals" which Moses - peace be upon him - became subject to after Moses existed due to the fact that a knowledge of this ordinance was created for him. Then once the child has reached the stage of ability to be able to understand, Allah has created that knowledge which was the father's heart desire. Accordingly, he heard that Ancient saying.
Thus if we were given prior knowledge of the coming of so and so at sunrise, and that prior knowledge persisted until the sun had risen, then the coming of so and so at sunrise would have been known to us through that prior knowledge without any necessity for its renewal.
Likewise, the eternity of the Knowledge of Allah - the High - should be understood.
And if it were possible for a will to come into being without a Will, it would be possible for the world to come into being without a will.
The first principle: Is the knowledge that every originated phenomenon in the
world is of His making, creation, and invention. There is no other creator of it
besides Him, and there is no innovator of it except Him. He created the creation
and fashioned them, and He brought into being their ability and movement.
All the deeds of His worshipers are created by Him and related to His Power, in
confirmation of His saying - the High - "the Creator of all things," and His
saying - the High - "Allah created you and what you do." (Ch.37:96 Koran). And
in His saying - the High - "Whether you speak in secret or aloud. He knows the
innermost of the chests. Shall He who has created all things not know? He is the
Subtle, the Aware." (Ch.67:13-14 Koran).
He commanded His worshipers to be careful in their words, deeds and secret
thoughts and intentions, because He knows the motives of their deeds. And the
creation is a proof of His Knowledge.
And how could He not be the Creator of the deeds of a person when His Power is complete and free of any impotence.
Furthermore His Power is related to the movements of the bodies of people - while these actions are similar to one another - the relation of the Power of Allah with them is self-existing.
What then would prevent its connection in the case of some actions and would not prevent it in the case of others, when all are similar? For how could the animal be capable of invention by itself? The spider and the bee as well as the rest of the animals produce fine works which amaze wise minds. But how could they have invented these things alone without the Lord of lords, when actually they are not aware of the details of what gains are produced from them?
All creation are abased before Him, the Owner of the Kingdom both visible and invisible, and the Compeller of the Heavens and Earth.
Rather, Allah - the High - created both the ability and those who are able, and
created both the choice and those who choose.
Therefore, the ability is a description for a human being and a creation for the
Lord; it is not a gain for Him.
As for the movement, it is a creation for the Lord - the High - and a description for the human being and his gain, in other words it is created with ability that is his description.
While movement is related to another description called ability, and for this reason it is considered a gain.
So, how could they be the result of complete compulsion when the difference between the voluntary actions and the involuntary reflexes is instinctively comprehended by man? Or, how could they be a creation of man when he does not know the different parts of acquired actions and their numbers? Thus when the two extreme positions are disproved, there remains nothing except the middle position which asserts that they are voluntary through the Ability of Allah by invention and through the ability of the worshiper by another connection which is expressed by the term acquisition or gain. The relation between the Ability and the willed is not necessary to be through invention only, since the Ability of Allah in eternity was to relate to the world although the world was not yet invented and at the time the invention was not yet occurring, while it is concerning the invention it is related with a different kind of relation.
Therefore, it is apparent that the relation of the Ability is not specifically for the occurrence of what was subject of the Ability.
From Him is good and evil, benefit and harm, Islam and disbelief, gratefulness
and ingratitude, winning and loosing, righteousness and error, obedience and
disobedience, Oneness and polytheism.
There is none that rescinds His Commands, none that audits His Decrees. He leads astray whom He wishes and guides whom He wishes. "None shall question Him about His works, but they shall be questioned." (Ch.21:23 Koran). This is attested by the narrations of the sayings of all the scholars of the prophetic quotations; "What He Wills is and what He does not will is not." And the saying of Allah - the Mighty, the Glorified -: "Had Allah pleased He could have guided all people." (Ch.13:31 Koran). And His saying - the High - "Had it been Our Will, We will give every soul its guidance." As for the evidence for it from the point of view of reason that if Allah neither likes nor wills sin and crimes, they must be in accordance with the will of the enemy, iblis - Allah cursed him - who is the enemy of Allah - the Exalted - and consequently what takes place in accordance with the will of the enemy will be greater than what takes place in accordance with the Will of Allah - the High -. How could a Muslim deem it possible that the Kingdom of the Compeller, the Owner of Majesty and Honor, be reduced to such a rank that would not even interest the leader of a village, because if the enemy of that leader has greater influence in the village, no doubt the leader would resign. Disobedience prevails upon mankind, which is considered by the innovators of theology to be happening despite the Will of Allah - the True, the High - . This would be considered the most weak and impotent. Exalted is the High, the Lord of lords above the blasphemous words of the transgressors. Furthermore when it becomes evident that the deeds of mankind are created by Allah, it becomes clear that they are also willed by Him.
If it should then be asked, "How does Allah forbid what He has willed and orders what He does not will?" We would say that the question is not that of will. For example, if a master strikes his servant and is reprimanded by the sultan, he justifies his action by the rebellion of the servant against him. But the sultan disbelieves him. So he attempts to prove his contention by ordering the servant to do something which the servant would refuse in the presence of the sultan. So, he tells the servant to saddle a mount. (Now how about this) the master has ordered the servant to do something which he really doesn't want him to do. If he had not given his order, he would not have been able to prove his point; and having given the order - had he really desired what he ordered he would have desired what has not served his purpose, which is unthinkable.
The Mu'tazilites said that these were obligatory on Him for the welfare of mankind. But this is impossible since He is the Sole Orderer, the only One to obligate and to forbid. How then can He be subject to any obligation or necessity or be subjected to given orders.
Obligation or necessity means one of two things: First, an act which, when it is
refrained from causes future harm. As when it is said that it is obligatory for
mankind to obey Allah if they want to escape torment by fire in the Hereafter,
or immediate harm as is the case when we say that it is obligatory for him who
is thirsty to drink otherwise he might die.
Second, it means that which its non-existence would lead to an impossibility. As
it is said that the existence of that which is known is necessary since its
non-existence will lead to an impossibility, namely knowledge becoming
If the adversary meant that the act of creation is necessary for Allah according to the first meaning, he would have exposed Him to harm.
If he implied the second meaning, he would be in agreement, because the
precedence of knowledge necessitates the existence of the known. However, if he
implied a third meaning, it is unintelligible.
As to his statement: "It is obligatory for the benefit of His worshiper" it is
corrupt logic, for if He is not harmed by neglecting the welfare of mankind, the
obligation upon Him bears no meaning.
Speaking of what is best for mankind is really its welfare in that He creates them in Paradise. While to create them in the world of trials and to expose them to sin then becomes subject to the danger of punishment, and to the terrors of presentation and accounting (on the Day of Recompense) is not enviable by the wise.
For if this were not contingent, it would be impossible for men to ask Allah to spare them that burden. But as a matter of fact they have beseeched Allah to spare them that burden when they said: "Our Lord do not over burden us more than we can bear." (Ch.2:286 Koran).
Furthermore Allah - the High - has informed His Prophet - the praise and peace
be upon him - that Abu Jahl would not believe Him, nevertheless Allah commanded
the Prophet to command Abu Jahl to believe in all the Words of Allah. But among
the Words of Allah were those that Abu Jahl would not believe in Him. How then
would he believe Him by not believing Him? The existence of such a thing is
If it is said that Allah - the High - will raise them from the dead and will
reward them according to the amount of pain which they suffered, and that such
action is obligatory upon Allah - the High - we would reply that anyone who
would claim that it is incumbent upon Allah to bring every ant which was killed
under the feet and every bug which was crushed back to life, so that He might
reward them the pain which they suffered, would violate the dictates of Religion
and reason, for it is said: "The description of reward and assembly is that it
is obligatory upon Allah" - if it is meant that it will harm Him to neglect
doing it it is impossible, and if it is meant by it other than the above
mentioned for the necessitating otherwise any other reason beyond this will be
I wonder what answer a Mu'tazilite would give when, in connection with his
statement that it is incumbent upon Allah to do what is best, we place before
him the following hypothetical debate.
It is supposed that in the Hereafter an argument takes place between two persons, a child and an adult, both of whom died as Muslims. Now, according to the Mu'tazilites, Allah exalts the rank of the adult and gives him preference over the child, because the former labored hard in acts of worship after he attained maturity. In fact this is incumbent upon Allah according to the Mu'tazil- ites. Suppose then that the child says, "O my Lord! Why have You exalted his rank above mine?" And Allah answers, "Because he has attained maturity and has labored in acts of worship." Thereupon the child rejoins, "But Lord, it is You who caused me to die a child. So it is obligatory upon You to have prolonged my life until I attained maturity; then I would have labored in Your worship. But You, O Lord, have deviated from justice by favoring him with long life. Lord! Why have You favored him?" Allah - the High - would then reply, "Because I knew that if you had lived to attain maturity, you would have committed the sins of polytheism and disobedience. Hence it was better for you to die a child." Such will the apology of the Mu'tazilite (or anyone who follows this way of thought) be for Allah - the Mighty, the Glorified -. But then the unbelievers will cry up from the midst of Hell-fire saying: "O Lord! Had You not known that if we had lived to attain maturity we should have committed the sin of polytheism, why then didn't You cause us to die in childhood before we could sin? We should have been content to enjoy in Paradise in a lesser rank than that of the Muslim child." What kind of answer could be given for this? In the face of this situation, is it not imperative to conclude that Divine matters, in view of their majesty, are exalted above to be weighed by the scales of the Mu'tazilites.
If it is said that because Allah can consider that which is best for mankind but instead inflicts upon them all manner of torment, this will be considered undesirable and unworthy of wisdom.
We should then say that the undesirable is that which does not suit the aim, but a thing may be undesirable to one person and desirable to the other if it disagrees with the desire of the one and suits the other.
Thus a family would deem the murder of their child undesirable but their enemies
would welcome it.
Hence if it is meant by what is not best that which does not suit the desire of Allah - the Originator, the Exalted - this will be impossible because He has no desire. Therefore, the opposite of the best is not expected from Him, nor the harm because He does not deal with that owned by others. And if it is meant by what is not best is that which does not suit the desire of others! Why, then did you say that this is impossible for Him? Is it not merely wishful thinking, disproved by what we have assumed of the debate of the adult and the child and the plea of the unbelievers from the midst of Hell-fire? Furthermore the wise is he who knows the realities of things and is capable of harnessing them in accordance with his will. It is here where the consideration of that which is best is imperative. And as to the wise among us, he takes into consideration that which is best as far as he himself is concerned, in order to gain therewith praise in this world and reward in the Hereafter, or to prevent some evil from befalling him all of which are impossible for Allah - the Exalted, the High -.
For if reason renders obedience obligatory, it does so either for no purpose, -
for reason does not obligate resurrection - which is impossible, or for some
purpose or desire.
Or, obligates it for a benefit and a desire which in turn has to return to the Worshiped and this is impossible concerning Allah - the High - for He is Exalted above desires and benefits. Even disbelief and unbelief, obedience and disobedience are the same from a beneficial point of view to Him. Or, it returns to the benefit of the worshiper which is again impossible, because he has no current desire. Because of obedience, he becomes tired and refrains from lower appetites.
While there is nothing in the future except reward and punishment. So, how then, can he know that Allah - the High - rewards the disobedient and the obedient and does not punish both of them because both are equal concerning (their having an affect on) Him. Because He is inclined to neither, but we know all these characteristics from the Religion. While he who arrives at it through drawing an analogy between the Creator and the creature errs, as the creature distinguishes between gratitude and ingratitude on the basis of the amount of joy, gladness, and pleasure which he derives from the one or the other. If it is said that if examination and knowledge are not obligatory except through the Religion which does not become defined unless the person who is required to fulfill its obligations examines it, and if that person should say to the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - that reason does not obligated him to examine while the Religion is not confirmed except through examination, and obviously I am not going to examine it. All this will conclude in the Messenger - the praise and peace be upon him - being silenced? We would then say that this argument is the same as that of the person who, on being warned by another that there is a wild lion standing behind him, and that unless he runs away the beast will devour him, and that he can ascertain that the warning is true if he will only look behind, says to the one who warned him that the truth of your warning can be established only if I look behind me, yet I am not going to turn and look behind me unless your truth is proven to me! This indicates stupidity of the speaker and guides him to destruction and there is no harm upon the guide!! As such is the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - he says: (in similitude) "Behind you is death, wild cats and the burning fire. If you are not cautious and realize my truthfulness by turning and looking at my miracles, you will be destroyed. So whosoever turns will know and be cautious and saved. But whosoever does not turn and insists is destroyed and lost, and there is no harm upon me even if all humanity are destroyed. It is only for me to proclaim the message in a clear manner." The Religion knows the existence of the wild lions after death, while reason aids in understanding the words of the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - and in realizing that which he prophecies is possible, and nature urges that precautions are taken against injury and harm.
A thing is necessary because its neglect causes injury and harm; while reason is that which renders a thing necessary because it makes known the impending harm. But reason in itself does not lead to the knowledge that when a person follows his appetite he will expose himself to harm after death. This then is the meaning of both Religion and reason as well as their part in determining that which is obligatory.
For had it not been for the fear of punishment, for the neglect of things commanded, obligations would not have been established, since the term obligatory would be meaningless if no harm in the Hereafter were consequent upon its neglect in this world.
The tenth principle: Is that Allah - the Exalted - has sent Prophet Muhammad - the praise and peace be upon him - as the seal of the prophets and as an abrogator of all previous Religions before him; the religions of the Jews and the Christians and the Sabians (a Judaeo-Christian sect). He (Allah) upheld him with unmistakable miracles and wonderful signs such as the splitting of the moon, the praise of the pebbles, and causing the dumb animal to speak, as well as water flowing from between his fingers and the unmistakable sign of the Glorious Koran with which he challenged the Arabs.
The Arabs, in their struggle with the Prophet, did everything to counteract him,
but despite their distinguished ability and excellence in eloquence and
rhetoric, they were not able to oppose him with anything like the Koran, because
it was not within the power of human beings, to combine the succinctness of the
phrases of the Koran and the smoothness of its style together with what it
contained of the news of the ancient generations and the fact that the Prophet -
the praise and peace be upon him - himself was unlettered having no experience
with books, with the prediction of unknown future events the subsequent
occurrence of which established the truthfulness of the Prophet - the praise and
peace be upon him -.
Examples of this are found in the Words of Allah: "You shall certainly enter the Sacred Mosque in security if Allah wills, with hair shaven or cut short and without fear." (Ch.48:27 Koran). And again, "The Romans have been defeated in a land close by; but after their defeat, in a few years they shall become the victors." (Ch.30:2-3 Koran).
The reason why a miracle attests the truthfulness of the messengers is because everything which human beings cannot do must be the work of Allah. Whatever is linked by the Prophet with a challenge enjoys the same position as that to which Allah says, "You are right." This is like the case of the person who, standing before the king announces to the subjects that he is the king's messenger, and in order to prove that he is, he asks the king to stand upon his throne and sit down three times contrary to his usual practice. The king obliges and the subjects know, beyond the shadow of doubt, that the king's action takes the place of his saying "You are right."
This is based upon ten principles
It was also well known that the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - and
the good, early generation were wont to seek refuge in Allah from the punishment
of the Grave.
This punishment of the grave is possible and the fact that the corpse may be dismembered and scattered in the bellies of lions and the gizzards of fowls does not prevent the belief in it, because the bodily members which feel the pain of punishment are those particular members to which Allah had ordained the restoration of sense, perception and feeling.
The fourth principle: Is the belief in the balance which is real. Allah says: "We shall set up just scales on the Day of Resurrection..." (Ch.21:47 Koran). And again: "Those whose scales are heavy shall triumph, but those whose scales are light shall lose their souls." (Ch.7:8-9 Koran).
The manner in which this is done is that Allah causes to exist in the balance of
men's deeds, a weight in proportion to the value of these deeds in His Sight.
Consequently the value of the deeds of men becomes known to them so that the
justice of Allah in punishment, His Grace in forgiveness, and generosity in
reward might become evident.
The fifth principle: Is the belief in the Bridge, which is stretched over Hell;
it is finer than a hair and sharper than the edge of the sword. Allah says: "and
guide them to the Path of Hell, and stop them to be questioned." (Ch:37:23-24
Koran). This is also a fact and belief in it is obligatory. For Allah who is
Able to make the birds fly in the air is also able to make mankind walk over the
One of the celebrated learned men said that every independent interpreter of the religion was right in his own interpretation; while others said that he who is right is one. No one of learning and intelligence, has charged 'Ali with error.
For real excellence is that which is excellent in the Sight of Allah, and no one
will have knowledge of it except the Prophet of Allah - the praise and peace be
upon him -.
Several verses in praise of all the Companions were revealed and a number of prophetic quotations that recite their honor have been handed down. Yet the subtle distinction of excellence and precedence is not grasped except by those who were eye-witnesses to the Revelation and had the opportunity to observe it in its setting and to watch its development. Had they not understood that so well they would not have arranged matters as they did, since it was not their habit to abandon the Way of Allah on account of threat or pressure and nothing would turn them away from the truth.
Thus we have either to replace him by another and consequently stir up strife, in which case the evil that will afflict the Muslims will surpass any loss they may incur because of the claimant's lack of piety and knowledge, qualifications designed to promote the public welfare; but no one will destroy the means of welfare in order to promote and enhance it, for this will be just like the person who will erect a single house and demolish a whole town. Or, we have to declare that there is no caliph and consequently there is neither Religion nor equity in the land, which is impossible. We declare that the authority of unjust rulers should be enforced in their land because of the urgent need for authority therein. How, then, do we not declare a caliph legitimate when the need for it is great and urgent? These then are the four pillars which comprise the forty principles which pertain to the foundations of the articles of faith. Whosoever believes therein will be in harmony with the Sunni (way of the Prophet) community and be an enemy to all heretics.
May Allah by His Grace guide us and lead our steps into the way of truth.
This chapter is comprised of three matters. First matter: People disagreed concerning the meaning of Islam (submission), whether it was identical with iman (belief) or different therefrom; and, in the event it was different, whether it was removed from belief and could exist without it, or inseparable from it and does not exist without it. Some have said that they are one and the same thing. Others say that they are two different things wholly unrelated, and still others say that although they are two different things, they are closely related to each other. Abu Talib al Makki had something to say in this connection; yet what he said was greatly confused and extremely long. Let us, therefore, proceed to declare the truth without bothering with that which is useless.
To begin with, this discussion comprises three considerations: First concerning
the literal meaning of the two terms Islam and Iman (Submission and Belief);
Second the technical meaning of the two terms in the Koran and prophetic
quotations; Third the functions which they fulfill in this world and the next.
The first is one of language, the second is of interpretation, and the third is
of jurisprudence and Religion.
The first consideration concerning the literal meaning of the words. Belief means literally acceptance. Concerning the brothers of Joseph, Allah says: "They said (to Jacob): 'We went racing and left Joseph with our things. The wolf devoured him. But you will not BELIEVE us, though we speak the truth'" (Ch.12:17 Koran), which is the same as saying that he will not accept their word. Islam on the other hand means submission, and surrender to Allah through yielding and compliance; and henceforth abjuring rebellion, pride, and stubbornness.
Acceptance lies in the heart while the tongue serves as its interpreter. But submission is more comprehensive and pervades the heart, the tongue and the senses. For every acceptance with the mind is a submission and a disavowal of pride and unbelief.
The same is true of verbal confession as well as of obedience and compliance with the senses. According to the dictates of language Islam is the more general term, while belief is the more specific. Therefore belief (Iman) represents the noblest part of Islam.
Consequently every acceptance is submission, but not every submission is acceptance.
The second consideration treats the technical meaning of the two terms in the Koran and prophetic quotations.
The truth of the matter is that the Religion i.e. the Koran and prophetic quotations, has used the two terms as synonyms interchangeably, as different terms of different meaning, and as related terms, one being a part of the other.
Their use synonymously is shown in the Words of Allah when He said, "So We brought the believers out of that they were in. We found in it but one household of those who had surrendered themselves," (Ch.51:35-36 Koran). Yet as a matter of fact there was only one family. Allah says: "Moses said: 'O my people, if you believe in Allah, in Him put your trust if you are Muslims.'" (Ch.10:84 Koran).
The Prophet also said, "Islam is built upon five pillars." At another time the Prophet was asked what belief was and he gave the same answers, namely the five pillars. (The bearing witness that there is no god except Allah, and Muhammad is His Prophet, prayer, obligatory charity, pilgrimage, the fast of Ramadan). The use of the terms Islam and belief to signify different meanings is shown in the Words of Allah when He said: "The Arabs declare: 'We believe.' Say: 'You do not' rather say, 'we submit'.." (Ch.49:14 Koran). This means that they have surrendered outwardly only. In this case the Prophet used belief for acceptance with the mind only and used Islam for surrender outwardly through the tongue and limbs.
(Similarly when Gabriel assumed the appearance of a stranger) and questioned the Prophet concerning belief the latter replied saying, "Belief is to believe in Allah, His Angels, Books, Prophets, the Last Day, the resurrection of the dead, the Judgement, and in the Decrees of Allah, the good and the evil." Gabriel then asked what Islam was, to which the Prophet replied by citing the five pillars. He thus used Islam for submission outwardly in word and deed. According to a prophetic quotation related on the authority of Sa'd the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - once gave a certain man a gift and to another he gave nothing whereupon Sa'd said: "O Prophet of Allah. You have given this man nothing although he is a believer." The Prophet added, "Or a Muslim." Sa'd repeated his question and again the Prophet added, "Or a Muslim." Their use as related terms, the one being a part of the other is shown by what has been related concerning the Prophet of Allah - the praise and peace be upon him - when he was asked what deeds were best and he replied, "Islam"; and when he was asked which type of Islam was best he answered: "Belief". This proves the use of Islam and belief (Iman) both as different terms and as related terms the one being a part of the other, of which latter use is the best linguistically, because belief is in reality a work - in fact the best of works.
Islam on the other hand is submission either with the mind or with the tongue,
or with the senses; but the best is the submission with the mind. It is that
acceptance which is called belief.
The use of the terms Islam and belief as two different words of different meanings, as related terms, the one being a part of the other, and as synonyms, does not overstep the possibilities which the language allows. Their use as different terms of different meanings makes belief signify acceptance with the mind only, which signification conforms to the dictates of language; it makes Islam signify submission outwardly, which thing is also in harmony with the requirements of language. For the submission in part is also called submission, since the unanimous agreement of the scholars application of a term is not a necessary prerequisite for its use.
For example, he who touches another with a part of his body is nevertheless
called contiguous despite the fact that the whole of his body is not in contact
with that of the other.
Hence the application of the term Islam to outward submission, although the inward submission is lacking, is in complete harmony with the rules of language. In this sense were the Words of Allah used when He said "The Arabs declare: 'We believe.' Say: You do not', rather say, 'we submit,'... (Ch.49:14 Koran). The same is true of the use of the two words Islam and Iman (belief) in the prophetic saying related by Sa'd where the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - added: "Or a Muslim." He did that because he preferred the one to the other. What is meant by the use of the two terms as different words of different meanings is that the terms contend for superiority and vie with each other in excellence.
Their use as related terms, the one being a part of the other, is also in
harmony with the rules of language. It is the use of Islam for submission with
the mind as well as with word and deed; while using belief for a part of Islam,
namely acceptance with the mind. This is what we meant by the usage of Islam and
belief as related terms, the one being a part of the other. It satisfies the
rules of language with respect to both the specific application of belief and
the general use of Islam, which is all-inclusive.
It was in this sense that the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - used
the term belief when he replied to the question put to him as to which type of
Islam is best, thereby making it a particular aspect of Islam and a part of it.
The use of the two terms synonymously, thereby using the word Islam for both
inward and outward submission, would make it all submission; the same is true of
belief, which may be used freely and its particular meaning extended, thereby
making it general and including under it outward submission. This is quite
possible because the outward submission through word and deed is the fruit and
result of inward submission.
Thus the name of a certain tree is freely used to signify both the plant itself as well as the fruit of the plant.
Similarly the significance of the term belief may be extended so as to become general, thereby making it synonymous with the term Islam and in exact agreement with it. Allah said: "We found in it but one household of those who had surrendered themselves," (Ch.51:36 Koran).
The third consideration deals with the legal rules which govern the two terms.
Islam and belief have two functions, one which pertains to the Hereafter and one
which pertains to this world.
The function which pertains to the Hereafter is for the purpose of bringing people forth from Hell fire and preventing them from remaining there for ever. The Prophet of Allah - the praise and peace be upon him - said, "Whoever has in his heart the weight of an atom of belief will be brought forth from Hell fire." People disagreed concerning this function and concerning its fulfillment, and have asked what things comprised belief. Some have taught that it is simply an inward adherence and verbal confession. Others add a third element; deeds according to the pillars of Islam.
We shall then remove the veil and declare that there is no disagreement at all that anyone who combines in himself all these three elements will have his final abode in Paradise. This is the first degree.
The second degree is that where a person has the first two elements and a part
of the third, namely inward adherence and verbal confession together with some
good deeds according to the pillars of Islam, but commits one or several great
According to the Mu'tazilites, the person by committing such great sins departs from the true belief but does not thereby become an unbeliever, but he becomes an "in between". He is neither a believer nor an unbeliever but occupies an intermediary position between the two, and will remain eternally in Hell fire. This, however, is false as we shall show.
The third degree is where the person fulfills the inward adherence and verbal confession but fails to perform the deeds according to the pillars of Islam with his limbs. People have disagreed concerning it. Abu-Talib al-Makki held that deeds were a part of belief and the latter is incomplete without them. He also claimed that the unanimous agreement of the scholars backed his position and cited in its support proofs and evidence which tend to prove the contrary, such as the Words of Allah: "Those who believe and do the things that are right." This quotation would indicate that deeds are something over and above belief rather than a part of it. Otherwise the reference to deeds would be a repetition, which is redundant.
It is strange that Abu-Talib al-Makki should claim the support of the unaminous
agreement of the scholars for this position of his and yet relate the following
prophetic saying: "No one would be declared an unbeliever unless he should deny
what he has professed," and finds fault with the Mu'tazilites because they
insist that a person who commits a great sin will remain eternally in Hell fire.
Yet he who holds such views holds the same views of the Mu'tazilites, since if
he were asked whether or not a person, who accepted Islam with his heart and
testified with his tongue thereto and then died, would be in Paradise, he would
say 'Yes', thereby asserting that belief could exist without deeds.
We would then add another question and ask him whether or not that person, if he
had lived until the time of prayer had arrived, but neglected to perform his
prayer and died immediately after, or if he had committed fornication and died,
whether or not he would remain eternally in Hell fire? If he should answer,
'Yes', he would agree with the Mu'tazilites; but if he should say, 'No', it
would amount to a declaration that deeds are neither a part of belief itself nor
a prerequisite for its existence. Neither are they necessary for gaining the
reward of Paradise. But if he should say that what he meant was that the person
would remain eternally in Hell fire only if he had lived a long time without
either praying or attempting any of the deeds prescribed by the Religion, we
would say, exactly how long is that period, and how many are those good deeds
through the neglect of which belief is rendered worthless? How many of the great
sins would, if committed, annul belief?" Such a thing is impossible to determine
and no one has ever done so.
The fourth degree is represented in the case of the person who accepts Islam inwardly with his mind but dies before either confessing it verbally with his tongue or performing any of the deeds which its pillars prescribe. Would it be said that such a person died a believer? People differ on this question. Those who insist on verbal confession as a prerequisite of belief would say that he died before fulfilling the conditions of belief. But this is false because the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - said, "Whoever has in his heart the weight of an atom of belief will be brought forth from Hell fire." This person's heart overflows with belief; how then would he remain eternally in Hell fire? Furthermore when Gabriel asked Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - concerning belief, the only condition set forth was to believe in Allah and His Messenger, His Angels, His Books, the Last Day, the resurrection of the dead, the Day of Judgement, and in the Decrees of Allah, with good or evil, as has already been mentioned.
The fifth degree is when a person accepts Islam in his mind and lives long enough to be able to confess the two phrases of the witness with his tongue and to know that they are obligatory upon him, but, for some reason, he does not so confess them. It is possible that his failure to confess them with his tongue is like his failure to pray. Concerning such a person we will say that he is a believer not doomed to Hell fire eternally. Because belief is simple acceptance and the tongue is its interpreter.
It is certain, therefore, that belief exists in its entirety even before its verbal confession with the tongue, so that the tongue can interpret it. This is the most plausible position, since there is no choice but to follow the exact meaning of terms and to satisfy the dictates of language. The Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - said, "Whoever has in his heart the weight of an atom of belief will be brought forth from Hell fire." The heart does not become void of belief because of the failure of the person to fulfill the duty of confessing that belief with the tongue, just as it does not become void of belief because of the failure of the person to perform obligatory deeds.
Some people have said that to confess the two phrases of the witness with the
tongue is indispensable because it is not merely an outward expression of the
inward belief, but rather the sealing of a contract and the commencement of a
life of witness and obligation. The first position is the more correct.
In this connection the Murji'ites have gone to the extreme, declaring that no
one who professed to be a Muslim will ever enter Hell fire, and that a believer,
even if he should sin, is sure of salvation. We shall see to it that their
position is refuted.
The sixth degree is to say with the tongue that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, but disbelieve it in his heart. We have no doubt that the fate of such a person in the Hereafter is with the unbelievers, and that he will remain eternally in Hell fire. On the other hand we are sure that in this world, the affairs of which are entrusted to imams and governors, he will be reckoned among the Muslims, because we have no access to his heart and have, therefore, to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that he adheres in his heart to what he had professed with his tongue. We, however, have our doubts concerning a third matter, namely the status which exists in this world between such a person and his Creator, Allah, in the event that one of his relatives dies, and as a result of his relative's death he accepts Islam in his heart as well. Having thus accepted Islam in his heart as well, he questions the learned men concerning his status saying, "I did not accept Islam with my heart, (although I had confessed it with my tongue), until my relative died. Having fallen heir to his property. I wish to know whether or not it is lawful for me to receive it?" Or in case he had married a Muslim woman (while he disbelieved in his heart), but upon his marriage he came to accept Islam in his heart; would he be required to repeat the marriage contract again? These questions are controversial and leave room for different opinions. Thus it may be said that the decisions of this world, whether they are clear or hidden, depend upon the express confession of Islam. It may also be said that, in so far as they pertain to the individual in his relationship to other men, these decisions depend upon the outward confession of Islam, because the heart of the individual is not known to others besides himself and Allah. The more correct position, and Allah knows best, is that it is unlawful for that person to receive the inheritance of his deceased relative, and that he must repeat the marriage contract a second time. For this reason, Hudhayfah used to stay away from the funerals of hypocrites, and it was customary for 'Umar to follow his example and absent himself whenever Hudhayfah did so.
Nevertheless prayer over the dead is a formal ceremony, although it is also one of the acts of worship. To guard oneself against what is unlawful is, like prayer, among the obligations of the individual towards Allah. This is not contradictory to our saying that inheritance is the law of Islam. Islam is surrender, in fact complete surrender is that which includes both outward and inward acts. These are doubtful problems in jurisprudence, based upon the outward meaning of words, vague generalities, and mechanical analogies. Consequently no one immature in knowledge should think that he could arrive at absolute certainty in any of these cases, although it has been customary to cite them under those parts of scholastic theology where absolute certainty is the desired goal. For no one who follows the common practices and conventional formalities will ever succeed.
Again they quote, "And Allah loves the good doers." Allah also said: "We do not waste the reward of him who does good deeds." (Ch.18:30 Koran). But they have no proof in any of these verses, because when belief is mentioned in them it means belief coupled with good deeds.
We have shown that belief is used to signify Islam, which is in conformity with the heart, word, and deed. Supporting this interpretation are many prophetic quotations concerning the punishment of sinners and the extent of their penalty.
Furthermore the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - said, "Whoever has
in his heart the weight of an atom of belief will be brought from Hell fire."
But how could anyone be brought forth from Hell fire if he had not first entered
therein? We also find in the Koran the following Words of Allah: "Allah does not
forgive (the sin of inventing an) association with Him, but He forgives other
sins to whomsoever He will." (Ch.4:116 Koran). The fact that Allah may exempt
from punishment according to His Will. The usage of "willing" indicates
He also said: "He who disobeys Allah and His Messenger, for him is the Fire of Hell, which he will be in forever." (Ch.72:23 Koran). To declare such a person an unbeliever is, nevertheless, unjust. Allah also said: "The evildoers shall suffer an everlasting punishment." (Ch.42:45 Koran). And again, "But those who come with an evil deed shall have their faces thrust into the fire." (Ch.27:90 Koran). Some of the understanding of the generalities of these verses on first impression contradict the other generalities. Therefore we must resort to the understanding of the specific versus general and also to discipline interpretation on both sides; especially when prophetic quotations are clear in their pronouncements that the sinners will be punished. In fact the Words of Allah, "There is not one of you who shall not go down to it." (Ch.19:71 Koran) is almost an express declaration that punishment is inevitable to all, because every believer cannot help but commit an offense.
Furthermore, by the Words, "In which none shall be roasted except the most wretched sinner who lied and turned away." (Ch. 92:15-16 Koran). Allah meant certain particular people, since the appellation 'the most wretched' refers to a particular person.
Again in His Word, "Every time a host is cast therein, its keepers will ask them" (Ch.67:8 Koran) refers to a special group of unbelievers. At any rate dealing with statements which are linguistically "general" to convey the meaning for "special" is not an uncommon practice. Because of this last verse al-Ash'ari as well as several other scholars of theology fell into the denial that all "general" usages, and that such usages await a qualifier "evidence" to clarify their meanings.
The fallacy of the Mu'tazilites arose from failure to understand the following Words of Allah. Allah says: "I am all Forgiving for he who repents, believes, practices good deeds, then is guided." And His Words when He declared, "By the afternoon time! Surely the human is in a (state of) loss, except those who believe and do good deeds..." (Ch.102:1-3 Koran). Also His Words when He said, "There is not one of you who shall not go down to it: such is a thing decreed, determined." (Ch.19:71 Koran) and continued saying: "We will save those who fear Us..." (Ch.19:72 Koran). Also the Words of Allah: "And whosoever disobeys Allah, and His Messenger, indeed for him is Hell, and therein they will abide forever." As well as every verse in which Allah mentions good deeds coupled with belief. Also the Words of Allah when He said: "He who kills a believer deliberately - his recompense is Hell, he is eternal there." (Ch.4:93 Koran). These generalities are also specific as is proved by the Words of Allah when He said: "but He forgives other sins to whomsoever He will." (Ch.4:116 Koran). Therefore freedom to forgive men sins, other than the sin of polytheism, must be left to Allah.
Similarly the words of the Prophet when he said, "Whoever has in his heart the
weight of an atom of belief will be brought forth from Hell fire," prove the
Allah declared: "As for those who believe and do good deeds, We do not waste the reward of him who does good deeds." (Ch.18:30 Koran). And again "Allah does not waste the wage of the good-doers." How then would Allah suffer the reward of belief itself as well as that of good deeds to be lost because of one single offense? As for the Words of Allah: "He who kills a believer deliberately," they mean whoever kills a believer because of his belief, and the words have been revealed for that particular purpose.
You may say, "What has already been said will lead to the conclusion that belief
obtains without good deeds although it is well known that the good, early
generation said that belief comprises inward adherence, verbal confession and
good deeds; explain to us therefore the meaning of all this. I shall then say it
is not unlikely that good deeds are considered a part of belief, because they
perfect and complete it, just as it is said that the head and hands are part of
man. It is evident that a person will cease to be human if his head no longer
exists; but he will not cease to be a human being if one of his hands is lost
Similarly both the exaltation and the praise are considered a part of prayer, although it is not annulled by their omission. Therefore acceptance with the heart stands in relation to belief as does the head in relation to the existence of man, since the one depends for its existence upon the other and ceases to exist when the other no longer is. The remaining good deeds are like the limbs of the body, some are more important than the others. The Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - said: "A believer is no longer a believer when he commits fornication." Furthermore the Companions held the same opinion as the Mu'tazilites concerning the fact that a person ceases to be a believer when he commits the sin of fornication. What this really means is that such a person is no longer a real believer possessing a complete and perfect belief, just as the deformed individual whose limbs have been amputated is described as being no longer a human being; in other words he lacks that perfection which is beyond actual humanity.
The same is true of all the qualities of the heart: all bodily actions proceed
from them, and then the very influence of these actions react upon them, thereby
confirming their existence and increasing their strength. This subject will be
discussed in two volumes of my book "Ihya Uloom Ad-Din, The Revival of Religious
Knowledge" one volume speaks of the destructive characteristics and another of
the characteristics of safety. In which we mention the relation of the inward to
the outward and that of deeds to beliefs.
This relation is of the same nature as that of the relation between the visible
world and the invisible world.
By the visible world, which is also called 'alam al-shahadah, (the witnessing world) I mean the world which is perceived by the senses; and by the invisible world, which is also called 'alam al-ghayb, (the unseen world) I mean the world which is perceived by the light of the heart. The heart belongs to the invisible world while the members of the body as well as their activities belong to the visible world. The subtlety and fineness of the interdependence of the two worlds have led some to think that they are closely connected, while others thought that there was no world except the visible which is made of the concrete and tangible bodies. One who has perceived the two worlds and realized first their independence and then their interdependence expressed his observation in the following manner: "The glass was fine, the wine was clear. So confusion spread: to some it seemed nothing but glass; while others swore 'This is but wine, no glass is here'." Let us go back to the main purpose of our discussion, especially since the invisible world is outside the scope of the science of practical religion.
Nevertheless the two worlds are connected and interdependent. For this reason
the science of revelation extends its scope every now and then into the realm of
practical religion and does not withdraw until it imposes some obligations.
This then is how belief, in accordance with this usage, increases through good
deeds. For this reason, 'Ali said, "Indeed belief will loom as a single white
spot in the heart of man. If the man will do that which is good the white spot
will grow and spread until the whole heart is white. Whereas hypocrisy makes it
first appearance as a black blotch in the heart of a man. If the man will do
that which is unlawful, the black blotch will grow and spread until the whole
heart is black, and blackness becomes man's second nature." Allah says: "No, but
what they used to do has veiled their hearts." The second usage of the term
belief denotes both acceptance and deeds, just as the Prophet - the praise and
peace be upon him - stated: "Belief comprises over seventy divisions." The same
thing is also seen in the words of the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon
him - when he said: "A believer is no longer a believer when he commits
fornication." And when deeds become an integral part of belief, it becomes
evident that it is subject to increase and decrease. Does this, however, affect
belief which is mere acceptance? The question is one of opinion, and we have
already stated that it does.
The third usage of the term belief denotes certain acceptance resulting from revelation and an open mind as well as from seeing truth with the light of the heart. The last is the least to lend itself to increase. I shall, however, say that the way in which the heart accepts certain things which are free of doubt differs. Thus the way the heart and mind accepts the fact that two are greater than one is unlike the way it accepts the fact that the world is created and originated. Although there is not the slightest doubt of the certainty of either fact. For certain things differ in the degrees of their clarity and in the degrees to which the mind accepts them.
We touched on this subject in the section of certainty in the "Book of Knowledge" under the characteristics of the learned people of the Hereafter; therefore there is no need to go over it again. In all these usages it became evident that what they have said concerning the increase and decrease of belief was true. How could it not be true when we have the express testimony of the prophetic sayings: "Whosoever has in his heart the weight of an atom of belief will be brought forth from Hell fire." In another prophetic saying: "He will be brought forth from Hell fire, who has in his heart the weight of a dinar of belief." Why then should the amount differ if the belief in the heart does not vary?
Thus when you are told that such and such a person is about to die and happens to say: "If it is the Will of Allah," you betray your desire and not your doubt. The same is true when you are told that a certain person will recover from his sickness and you say, "Allah willing," by way of expressing your earnest desire.
The phrase has thus been transferred from one expressing doubt to one which signifies desire. Also, in the same way is its transfer to express courtesy and respect for remembering Allah in all circumstances.
The third reason for the use of those qualifications arises from doubt and means, "Allah willing, I am truly a believer," since Allah spoke of some particular men as being true believers. Consequently believers are divided into two groups: those who are described as truly believers and those who are not. This arises from doubt concerning the perfection of belief and not its reality. Every person doubts the perfectness of his belief, yet this doubt does not constitute unbelief. Doubting the perfectness of belief is right and justified for two reasons: The first is because hypocrisy militates against the perfectness of belief, and hypocrisy is something hidden while freedom from it is readily discerned or determined.
The second is because belief is perfected through the fulfillment of good deeds
which are not known to exist in their perfect form.
As for deeds Allah says: "The believers are those who believe in Allah and His
Messenger, and do not doubt; and who struggle in His way with their possessions
and their selves. Such are the truthful ones." (Ch.49:15 Koran). The doubt
would, there- fore, be concerning this truthfulness.
Similarly Allah says: "But righteousness is to believe in Allah, and the Last
Day, and the angels, and the Book, and the prophets." Thus Allah laid down
twenty qualities, such as the fulfillment of promises and fortitude under
hardship, as conditions for belief and then said, "Indeed, these are they who
are true." Allah also says: "Allah will raise up those who believed among you,
and those who have been given knowledge in ranks." (Ch.49:11 Koran). He also
says, "Those who spent before the victory and took part in the fighting, are
mightier in rank and are not equal to those who spent and fought thereafter."
(Ch.47:10 Koran). He also says: "They are of ranks before Allah." The Prophet -
the praise and peace be upon him - said, "Belief is uncovered and its clothing
is piety." And again, "Belief comprises of over seventy branches, the least of
which is to clear an obstacle from the road." This shows the dependence of the
perfectness of belief on good deeds.
A Hasan al Basri was once told: "There is no more hypocrisy nowadays." To which he replied, "Brother! Were the hypocrites to perish from the land you would feel lonely on the way." Again either al Hasan himself or someone else said, "Were tails to grow on the backs of the hypocrites and trail behind them our feet would no longer be able to touch the earth." Once Ibn 'Umar, on hearing a man speak disparagingly of al Hajjaj (the Umayyad governor), told him, "Would you speak disparagingly of him if he were here present?" The man answered, "No." Thereupon Ibn 'Umar said, "We used to consider this hypocritical at the time of the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him -. The Prophet said, 'He who has a fork-tongue in this world will, in the Hereafter, be made fork-tongued by Allah'".
The Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - also said, "The worst man is the two-faced who meets one people with one face and another people with another face." Al Hasan al-Basri was once told, "There are some who say that they do not fear hypocrisy." Thereupon he answered, "By Allah, I would rather be sure that I am free of hypocrisy than have all the gold in the world." Al Hasan also said, "Among the different kinds of hypocrisy are the disagreements between the tongue and the heart, between the concealed and the revealed, and between the entrance and the exit." A certain person told Hudhayfah: "Indeed, I fear I am a hypocrite." To which Hudhayfah replied, "Do not fear. If you were a hypocrite you would not have feared hypocrisy. Indeed, hypocrisy does not fear hypocrisy."
Ibn abi Mulaykah said, "I have known one hundred and thirty of the Companions of the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him -, all of whom feared hypocrisy." It was related that the Prophet of Allah - the praise and peace be upon him - was once sitting with a group of his Companions who were discussing a certain man and praising him highly. Suddenly, while they were in the midst of their discussion, the man himself appeared before them with his face still wet with the water of ablution, carrying his shoes in his hands and his forehead covered with dust from prayer. Thereupon they said to the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - "Behold. This is the man whom we were discussing." The Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - turning to them, said, "I see on his face the mark of satan." Then the man came and, after greeting the group, sat in their midst. The Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - then addressed him and said, "Tell me, I ask you by Allah, have you not said to yourself when you approached the group that there was no one among them who was better than you?" The man replied, "By Allah! Yes, I did." In his prayer the Prophet said, "O Allah, I seek refuge in You against the evil of things I did and things I left undone." He was then asked, "Are you afraid O Prophet of Allah?" To which he replied, "What could make me feel secure when the heart lies between two of the fingers of the Merciful, and He does with them what He wills?" Allah says: "And there shall appear to them, from Allah, that which he did not expect." This was interpreted in commentaries to mean that men have done things which they thought were good but on the Day of Judgement these things will appear in the balance in the scale of evil.
Sariy al Saqti once said, "If a person enters a garden containing trees of every kind and on them are birds of every kind, and then each bird calls to him in a different language saying, 'Peace be upon you, O friend of Allah', and as a result he feels very well pleased and satisfied, he becomes their captive." These prophetic quotations and narratives reveal to you the gravity of the matter, particularly because of the subtle nature of hypocrisy and hidden polytheism, and bring out the fact that no one can be safe from them.
This led 'Umar ibn-Khattab to ask Hudhayfah about himself - whether or not he
was numbered among the hypocrites.
Abu Sulayman ad Darani said, "I heard a certain governor say something and I wanted to express my disapproval of it but feared lest he order me to be killed. And although I did not fear death I was afraid lest I became tempted to boast before men when my spirit departs. For this reason I refrained from expressing my disapproval of the governor's words. This kind of hypocrisy strikes against the truth, perfection, and purity of belief, rather than against its reality.
It has been said that the Words of Allah: "And when the agony of death comes in
truth," (Ch.50:19 Koran) mean that the preordained thing (has been fulfilled)
and made known.
One of the good, early generation said that deeds would be judged by their ends. Abu ad Darda' used to swear by Allah saying: "There is no one who feels safe in his belief who is not robbed of it." It was also said that some sinful deeds were not punished except by their sad ends. We seek refuge in Allah against such deeds and such punishments. It has also been said that such punishments await those who falsely claim righteousness and the gift of miracles. One of the gnostics once said, "If I were given the choice between martyrdom at the outer gate of the house and death as a true believer at the door of an inner room, I would choose the latter because I do not know what might occur to me and divert my heart from true belief on my way (from the inner room) to the outer gate of the house." Another said, "If I had known a certain person to have been a true believer for the last fifty years and then, even though so frail a thing a pole should hide him from my sight before his death, I could not be sure that he died a true believer." According to one condition, "Whoever says, 'I am a believer', is an infidel; and whoever says, 'I am learned', is ignorant." In the interpretation of the Words of the Allah, "And the Words of your Lord are completed in truth and in justice." It has been said that truth relates to those who died a believer and justice relates for he who dies an unbeliever. He - the High - said: "And all final matters belong to Allah." No matter how little doubt may be in such cases the resort to qualification is obligatory, because belief is a means of grace for the Hereafter just as fasting is a means of grace for absolving the heart from guilt in this life. Whatever fast is rendered void before sunset it is no longer a fast and will not absolve from guilt. The same thing is true of belief. In fact a person may be asked about a previous fast concerning which there is no doubt. He will be asked, "Have you fasted yesterday?" and he will reply. "Yes, Allah willing." For genuine fasting is the only acceptable fasting, and the acceptable fasting is unknown except to Allah.
For this reason it is desirable to use the qualification, "Allah willing" in all the deeds of righteousness. This will imply doubt as to their acceptance by Allah, since such acceptance, despite the outward fulfillment of all the prerequisites of validity, may be blocked by hidden causes unknown except to Allah, the Lord of lords of the Mighty Majesty. Hence it is desirable to entertain some doubts concerning the validity. These, therefore, are the different reasons for the desirability of qualifying one's answers when asked about his belief. With it we conclude the book of the Foundation of Islamic Belief. The book concluded with the praise of Allah, the High and Allah praised our Master Muhammad, and every chosen worshiper. The following principle is explained by Ahmad ibn ed-Darwish
Ihsan is mainly an ethical and spiritual course which respects and follows the
scholars of Ihsan as well as the other two parties of scholars namely, the
scholars of Iman (belief) i.e. Imam Ashari and Salaf (first generation) as well
as the scholars of Islamic Jurisprudence i.e. Shafi, Hanballi, Maliki, and
In simple words, Ihsan is based on three dimensions: For the sake of self cleansing, one asks Allah for forgiveness repeatedly, over and over again. This is followed by the multi repeated remembrance of bearing witness that there is no god except Allah. Thirdly, by the abundant repeating of the the praise of Allah and His angels for Prophet Muhammad as prescribed in the Koran - the praise and peace be upon him -.
During the time of Imam Ghazali, the practice of Ihsan was common and he too followed a spiritual sheikh of Ihsan. In his book "Al Munqiz min Ad- Dalal" (The Safety from Deviation) he investigated the validity of the roots, theory, and practices of many sects from Greek philosophy to the heritage of the Indians and Chinese. In this book he dissected and analyzed each sect individually and certified without any doubt that the Sufism of the Sunni Muslims was by far the best path to the Creator.
Having a spiritual guide is highly recommended. The undermentioned Prophetic quotation describes the three parts of the Religion - Islam, Iman and Ihsan. "One day when we (the companions) were with the Messenger of Allah - the praise and peace be upon him - a man with very white clothing and very black hair came to us. There was no sign of travel upon him and none of us recognized him.
He sat down in front of the Prophet - the praise and peace be upon him - with his knees touching his. Then, placing his hands on his thighs he said: 'Tell me, Muhammad about Islam.' He replied: 'Islam means that you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, that you pray (the five daily prayers), pay the obligatory charity, fast the month of Ramadan and make the Pilgrimage to the House (Ka'bah in Mecca) if you have the means.' The man replied: 'You have spoken the truth.' We were surprised at his questioning and then confirming that he had spoken the truth. Then the man asked: 'Now tell me about Iman (belief).' He replied: 'It means that you believe in Allah, His angels, His Messengers and the Last Day, and that you believe in both the decree of good and evil.' The man replied: 'You have spoken the truth.'
'Now tell me about Ihsan (linguistically, perfecting).' He replied: 'It means that you worship Allah as if you are seeing Him, because He sees you although you do not see Him.'
Then the man asked: 'Now tell me about the Hour.' He replied: 'The one who is asked about it is no better informed than the one who is asking.' So the man asked: 'Then tell me about its signs?' He replied: 'That the maid servant will give birth to her mistress and the bare-footed, naked, poor herders are seen living arrogantly in high buildings.'
Then the man departed, and after I had waited for a long time - the Prophet, the praise and peace be upon him - asked me: 'Do you know who the questioner was Umar?' I replied: 'Allah and His Messenger know best.' So he told me: 'He was Gabriel who came to teach you your Religion.'